Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Special Prosecutor Subpoenas Cuyahoga County Election Workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 07:44 AM
Original message
Special Prosecutor Subpoenas Cuyahoga County Election Workers
Special prosecutor subpoenas election workers

Monday, August 22, 2005
Angela D. Chatman
Plain Dealer Reporter

A special prosecutor investigating charges of illegal conduct in election recount last December has subpoenaed employees of the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections. The employees will testify before a Cuyahoga County grand jury Tuesday. The special prosecutor, Erie County Prosecutor Kevin J. Baxter, said that subpoenas were sent to as many as 10 people last week. He said he could not disclose who would testify.

"This is simply a fact-finding procedure right now," Baxter said. A spokeswoman for the Cuyahoga County prosecutor's office confirmed that some election board staffers received subpoenas.

Board of Elections Director Michael Vu declined to say whether he received a subpoena. He referred questions to the Cuyahoga County prosecutor's office, which represents the elections board in legal matters. Toledo lawyer Richard Kerger made the charges last December on behalf of Green Party candidate David Cobb and Libertarian Party candidate Michael Badnarik.

In a Dec. 31 letter to the board and Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Bill Mason, Kerger charged that the elections board staff broke the law because:

-It failed to randomly select the 36 precincts used to represent at least 3 percent of the total vote for the December recount.

-It conducted "test-run" recounts without witnesses.

-It did not allow witnesses to observe irregularities in the review of cases where the presiding judge transported ballot assemblies, ballots and other items.

-It repeatedly fed trays of ballots back through the counting machines without keeping records of the counts.

-It failed to investigate discrepancies between the certified recount vote totals and the certified original totals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC