Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: Programs on Hill Seek Leaders Who Answer Not To Voters, but God

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 08:21 AM
Original message
LAT: Programs on Hill Seek Leaders Who Answer Not To Voters, but God
WASHINGTON — In the blue and gold elegance of the House speaker's private dining room, Jeremy Bouma bowed his head before eight young men and women who hope to one day lead the nation. He prayed that they might find wisdom in the Bible — and govern by its word.
....
Nearly every Monday for six months, as many as a dozen congressional aides — many of them aspiring politicians — have gathered over takeout dinners to mine the Bible for ancient wisdom on modern policy debates about tax rates, foreign aid, education, cloning and the Central American Free Trade Agreement.
....
They learn to view every vote as a religious duty, and to consider compromise a sin.
....
"I'm sure there are people who won't appreciate the fact that this class goes on here in the Capitol," Myal Greene said one recent evening.

He glanced around the stately dining room, reserved for the institute by a member of Congress. (House regulations allow private groups to hold events in the Capitol as long as they are noncommercial, nonpolitical and do not discriminate based on race, creed, color or national origin.)

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-statesman23aug23,1,5389280.story?coll=la-news-politics-national
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. How about discriminate based on religion?
What exactly does creed mean anyway? Race, creed, color, or national origin all seem to be about race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaver Tail Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. A Creed is
1: any system of principles or beliefs
2: the body of teachings of a religious group that are generally accepted by that group


Google is your friend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, sure
"...to mine the Bible for ancient wisdom on modern policy debates about tax rates, foreign aid, education, cloning and the Central American Free Trade Agreement."

That should read: "...to find scripture that can be taken out of context to support RW policies."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sorry, but it's PAST time to begin taxing churches and
religious organizations!

Why can't the country see this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Nonpolitical? Religion is the most political aspect of
politics. Our new "democratic Iraq" will be based on religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. That seems to qualify as a violation of the regulations, to me too...
but it's probably only applicable to strictly partisan politics. Maybe they have a dem in there willing to pervert responsibility to constituents, making it 'bi-partisan'.

You'd think the whole concept of pushing for a theocracy would be political enough to disallow it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Since Nov. 2000 those rightwingers have nibbled at the
Constitution until it is in tatters. Didn't they "crown" the Rev. Moon in one of the rooms in the Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC