from The Nation
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/outrage?bid=13&pid=15883Memo to Democrats
"Split" seems to be the new buzzword in Democratic Party circles.
"A split over the war, the wimp thing, and how to win," read a Philadelphia Inquirer headline on Sunday. "Democrats Split Over Position on Iraq War," followed the Washington Post yesterday. "Democrats are Split on Questioning Roberts," the New York Times wrote the same day.
<<snip>>
Instead of adapting to meet the bloody realities on the ground in Iraq or the profound shift against the war in public opinion polls at home, party leaders like Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and Harry Reid are sticking to a flawed stay-the-course strategy. Bold bipartisan criticism of the war from Democrat Russ Feingold and Republican Chuck Hagel has yet to sink in. Former Clinton press secretary Mike McCurry presents a prime example: "Credit the Democrats for not trying to pour more gasoline on the fire, even if they're not particularly unified in their message," McCurry told the Post. "Democrats could jump all over them and try to pin Bush down on it, but I'm not sure it would do anything but make things worse. The smartest thing for Democrats to do is be supportive." Translation: Democrats should help prolong the war, not end it
<<snip>>
This is both bad politics and bad policy.
"Bad Iraq News Worries Some in GOP in '06," the Times reported last week. "There is no enthusiasm for this war," said Tennessee Republican Rep. John Duncan. "It certainly is not going to help Republican candidates, I can tell you that much." Added conservative mastermind Grover Norquist, "If Iraq is in the rearview mirror in the '06 election, the Republicans will do fine. But if it's still in the windshield, there are problems."
Defense expert Juliette Kayyem nailed the policy component in a must-read post Sunday at TPMCafe. "The question--what about Iraq--seems to me to be the pivotal, and only, question for Democrats right now," Kayyem writes. "What should the Dems be saying? Not more troops, please. The fact that many Democratic leaders are the ones clamoring for more troops, long after the American public has abadoned them on this one, is disconcerting to say the least. We have long passed that point."
Kayyem then admits what so few of her fellow Democrats have been willing to: "This was our war too. We ought, as a party, to be saying that we were wrong, and we ought to be saying it now. The notion that all we are complaining about is how they waged this war, rather than the war itself, strikes me as not truthful. It was--both from its inception, its reasoning, and its engagement --a bad war.