Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are Robertson's Comments A Backhanded Slam To * Co's......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 02:04 AM
Original message
Are Robertson's Comments A Backhanded Slam To * Co's......
Edited on Wed Aug-24-05 02:14 AM by global1
war plan in Iraq? Is Robertson saying we could have saved alot of money if we would have covertly assassinated Saddam? Is the Christian Coalition coming out against the war in Iraq? Could Robertson be supporting Cindy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
julianer Donating Member (964 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not really
the point wasn't getting rid of Saddam, but getting an army sitting on the oil reserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. They all tried to bomb Saddam. That is why Saddam slept in so
many places. Even Clinton would have done that.If you break the rule of the UN - you get a bomb on your head. Why should some civilian die because you are going against international law - when nations bombs as punishment?

That being said - Chavez was getting 'high level visitors' and making friends in the US these past months. Someone panicked - may have suggested to Robertson or spoon-fed him some line so that he would react like a madman and re-frame the debate on Chavez to good vs. evil.

Oh no - Mr. Bill! Splat.

They seem to be missing more than they are hitting with their tangled webs.

I think Robertson is in the loop so to speak. Some greased his engine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. No
His comments are just more brainwashing by the nutjob fundies:

As long as we post the Ten Commandments, we don't actually have to follow any of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC