Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"450 major strategic targets" in Iran would require "the nuclear option"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:18 AM
Original message
"450 major strategic targets" in Iran would require "the nuclear option"
http://direland.typepad.com/direland/2005/08/pat_buchanans_m.html



Now, here's an interesting little tid-bit, considering the source: Pat Buchanan's magazine, American Conservative, has published a report saying that Dick Cheney has had the Pentagon prepare a contingency plan for an immediate air strike on Iran, including the use of tactical nuclear weapons, in the event of "another 9/11."

The report, in Buchanan's mag's "Deep Background" column, claims: "In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same for Iran. The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President Dick Cheney’s office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States. The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons. Within Iran there are more than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option. As in the case of Iraq, the response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of terrorism directed against the United States. Several senior Air Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the implications of what they are doing—that Iran is being set up for an unprovoked nuclear attack—but no one is prepared to damage his career by posing any objections."

This report is signed by one Philip Giraldi, who is identified as "a former CIA Officer, and a partner in Cannistraro Associates." This makes it even more interesting -- for the head of Cannistraro Associates is none other than former CIA counter-terrorism chief Vince Cannistraro (right), who was also Director for Intelligence Programs at the National Security Council under President Reagan, former Special Assistant for Intelligence in the office of the Secretary of Defense, and whose face you've seen a lot on TV -- he's currently a consultant to ABC News on intelligence and terrorism.

Now, I'm always mindful of the old saw that military intelligence is to intelligence as military music is to music -- and the blame-shifting between Cheney and his cronies and the CIA for intelligence failures in Iraq has led to a lot of bad blood between Langley types, past and present, and the Veep's office. But, while one wouldn't necessarily trust the ears of Cannistraro and his cronies when it comes to sussing out matters abroad, one wouldn't be wrong in thinking that the fact that this well-placed prominent veteran of a lifetime in the U.S. national security apparatus spent a lot of time at the highest levels of the intelligence community gives him and his subordinates access to some pretty juicy Pentagon gossip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. "in the event of "another 9/11."
That statement alone scares the Hell out of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I hear you, events that are falling into place are eerily familiar
You have a major oil exporter, Iran, threatening to go off of dollar based oil sales. Our idiot in charge is taking another long vacation. Dimson's ratings are tanking. A plethora of diversionary media reports, from lost blondes to shark attacks, fill our newspapers and airwaves.

Sounds like the set up from August '01, preparation for the much sought after "Pearl Harbor type event" that PNAC documents longed for.

And when it happens, the sheeple people will cheer as we go under martial law, and invade another country that didn't have a damn thing to do with the "terrorist attack".

Make your preparations wisely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. So, they're already sure Iran is going to be behind the next 9/11?
Interesting.


Kreskin is now part of the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. As sure as they were that Iraq was behind the 'last 9/11'
In other words, the truth of it will be irrelevant -- it makes no difference to them.

They will say Iran is behind it and will attack before anyone can say otherwise. The Republicans in Congress will fall in line, and most of the Democrats will be too worried about 'looking weak' after an attack and will cave to Bush's new war, truth be damned.

Just like last time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syncronaut Seven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'll miss San Diego, L.A., S.F, Seattle, Portland, New York and Baltimore
Well, maybe not Baltimore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauldavid Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I live in San Diego
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 11:41 AM by pauldavid
So I really hope you are wrong.

:nuke: :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sambird90 Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. since when does
the vp have the power over the use of nuclear weapons oh thats right the vp really running things. proof!!!!who was the one that was rushed off for safety while * sat there waiting to be told what to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrrevolution Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Cheney controls all from His Undisclosed Underground Bunker
Uncle Dick has his hand on all the real levers.

Bush boy is allowed to run around, pretend he is in charge, shoot off his mouth, and be the diversion from the evil being done behind the scenes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. Not that I trust this administration, but it would be gross incompetence..
for the DOD NOT to have such contingency plans worked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yes, it's not so much the "reasonable" nature of contingency plans...
...as it is the administration's eagerness to put the plan into action.

Somewhere in Cheney's bunker is a piece of scrap paper with the scribbled figures estimating the first year's Halliburton profits...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauldavid Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. Any bets as to the date?
Do you think it is more likely before or after September 11th?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. Cheney has become a biblical prophet now?
I'm impressed. If/when "another 9/11" happens, Cheney already knows that Iran is (er...I mean will be) behind it, and so he's preparing now to nuke the shit out of them.

Must be his little Office of Special Intelligence is hard at work on John Titor's time travel device. Jeesh! If America falls for the same bullshit shell game again, we deserve what ever happens next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. So like if China bombs us, we ignore them and bomb Iran? Brilliant.
Nothing like killing the chickens to stop the wolf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. Cheney/Bush don't have the balls to hit Iran! - scare tactics
because they sure as hell can't use the red-light US. system, what are they going to do. take some of the troops fighting in iraq and send them to Iran...whats's the plan after we nuke em? wait for a response stateside?

CHeney, your shit's getting old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. Not to worry, Cheney just wants to Nuke Iran, not invade them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obreaslan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Can we really take away the Filibuster from Iran???????
Seriously though, this is very scary. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. Stupidity and apathy in mainstream America
are a perfect compliment to the cupidity of this government.

Gyre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC