Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jeb's Sect. of State caught trying to kill initiative on redistricting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 11:24 AM
Original message
Jeb's Sect. of State caught trying to kill initiative on redistricting
First from the article today

http://www.sptimes.com/2005/08/26/State/Length_kills_ballot_a.shtml

Length kills ballot appeal

An earlier state approval is rescinded because the redistricting petition has more words than the law allows.

JONI JAMES
Published August 26, 2005

TALLAHASSEE - A citizen initiative aimed at stripping lawmakers of the power to draw political districts was rescinded by Florida's top elections official Thursday because it has too many words.

Secretary of State Glenda Hood acknowledged her staff erred when it approved the petition in March. But that does not change the fact that the measure is six words too long, she wrote in a letter to the measure's backers.

"Our error does not cure their defect," said Hood press secretary Jenny Nash

..cut...

611,009 signatures needed by a Feb. 1 deadline for the November 2006 ballot.

The flawed measure already was signed by more than 200,000 people,

..full article at link....

This shows another devious action by Jeb and friends. Jeb is FOR redistricting in CA but against it in Florida... I wonder why...

From the article " After the flaw was disclosed Tuesday by the St. Petersburg Times" IMHO Hood knew the error had been made, but did not plan to kill it until Jan 2006 when it would have been too late for it to be corrected. IMHO we got lucky the St. Pete Times pointed this out NOW so that it could be corrected in time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick for importance.
Glenda would have played this until the end. Glad they outed her on this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. And I believe that was her real game plan
but the St. Pete Times brought out the problem early enough to fix.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can't we just draw the damn boundaries
by population, by county and not allow any more redistricting unless there are population shifts dramatic enough to transfer an entire county to a different district? Gerrymandering pisses me off SO MUCH! My favorite was when a bunch of dems got redistricted out of their seats in Texas vs I don't think any republicans. Yeah, that wasn't politically motivated!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. the sad part is they use computers to draw these
districts so Repugs do not lose, BUT those same computers COULD draw nice compact districts that put as many people with the same needs into one district. IE some districts now span 3-5 counties and all the people in that district do not have the same needs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC