Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Votes on the Nine Sitting Supreme Court Justices

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 12:29 PM
Original message
Senate Votes on the Nine Sitting Supreme Court Justices
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGB3K1S4WCE.html

How the Senate voted on the nominations of the nine justices on the Supreme Court:

---

William H. Rehnquist: Confirmed 68-26 for associate justice, 65-33 for chief justice.

John Paul Stevens: 98-0

Sandra Day O'Connor: 99-0

Antonin Scalia: 98-0

Anthony Kennedy: 97-0

David Souter: 90-9

Clarence Thomas: 52-48

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: 96-3

Stephen G. Breyer: 87-9

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm amazed at the vote for Scalia. What a RW nutjob he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Two things
One, the vote on Renquist for Chief is the one which mattered in regards to Scalia. The effort at the time was to stop his elevation and thus there would have been no Scalia appointment (he took Renquist's seat).

Two, that was the last nominee not to be judged on ideology. It just wasn't really done back then. Unless a nominee had an ethical or legal problem, he or she was confirmed. Renquist had been alledged, I believe truthfully, to have committed perjury and to have conspired to keep Hispanics from voting in Arizona.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Exactly right. It wasn't until Bork that ideology even came into play,
because prior to that appontment, the court was never really used as an ideological tool.

Once it became obvious the right was pushing an ideological agenda that catered to an elite minority, the attitudes changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Who were
The Dems that voted for Thomas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't recall, but it was quite a few.
IIRC we had 56 seats in that Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah I know that.
I know that atleast one member of the Judiciary Comittee voted for him, because had all Dems. voted against him, his nasty ass wouldn't have made it out of comittee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Here's a list:
Boren (D-OK)
Breaux (D-LA)
DeConcini (D-AZ)
Dixon (D-IL)
Exon (D-NE)
Fowler (D-GA)
Hollings (D-SC)
Johnston (D-LA)
Nunn (D-GA)
Robb (D-VA)
Shelby (D-AL)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Funny thing is
The only one of those guys still in the Senate is Shelby, and he's a Republican. So dissapointing that there were 11 Senators who voted for this horny bastard and if only 3 of them had voted the other way this guy wouldn't be here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It was sad. At least Dixon paid a price for it and was defeated
in his 1992 primary. And it was no surprise later when Shelby switched parties given this vote and others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC