Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Santorum Apparently Caught In Lie

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 01:50 AM
Original message
Santorum Apparently Caught In Lie
In an interview for an Aug. 20 story in the Philadelphia Inquirer, Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) said he has raised various questions about the Bush Administration's handling of the Iraq War.

"I still have concerns about our level of activity with respect to fighting the insurgency, and the number of former Baathists who are put in positions of power in the country and their relationships with Iran. I have expressed those concerns publicly and privately," he said.

But now it appears Santorum has been caught in a lie. According to an Aug. 25 story in the Inquirer, Santorum's staffers "cannot locate public statements of the senator questioning the Iraq war." That followed the Inquirer noting in print that "his public statements on those issues could not be found."

Uh-oh.

Robert L. Traynham, Santorum's spokesman, told the<em> Inquirer</em> that a search of LexisNexis, a news database, and the office's press clippings had not turned up any comments matching Santorum's claim.

Santorum, full of excuses as to the discrepancy between what he claimed he said and the lack of supportive evidence, offered: "I do a lot of interviews on TV, on radio, with print reporters who don't happen to write everything I say."

But uh-oh. As most journalists know, LexisNexis, in fact, includes transcripts from major television and radio networks.

And certainly, as conservatives like Santorum are quick to point out, the "liberal media" frequently reports even small policy difference among Republican leaders. It's hard to believe that the entire media would fail to jump on a story as big as the third-highest-ranking Senate Republican publicly criticizing the war policies of a Republican president.

But that's the spin that Santorum is trying. Facts be damned, he'll probably keep saying it until the issue goes away.

***

Santorum, in the midst of a tough bid for re-election next year, made his apparently false claims about questioning the administration in response to a charge by Democratic challenger Robert P. Casey Jr. that Santorum has failed to "ask the tough questions" about Iraq.

In truth, Santorum has been a major supporter of the administration's Iraq policy.

Just last week, the Inquirer reports, Santorum said of the war: "(T)his is something we have to do to protect our country. I feel strongly about that."

His reluctance to publicly question Bush has more to do with Santorum's style than his priorities, Santorum aides say. He prefers taking a longer view, and if the war looks grim for several weeks, Santorum won't suddenly protest, Traynham said.

***

This article first appeared at Journalists Against Bush's B.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, I am shocked, shocked. Santorum tell a lie?
Think of the kittens God will kill over this.
Santorum, making misleading statements for political brownie points? Who ever would have thought such a thing could happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Santorum lies?
Plus he's not too stable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kbm8795 Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. This sounds like another effort by Ricky
to suddenly appear more mainstream - he's running scared in this election and he hasn't been crowned king of the new theocracy yet. His plans will be spoiled if he doesn't win re-election.

It sounds like he's trying to position himself to seem more in tune with Pennsylvanians through the election, then he'll resort once again to his commitment to people like the 700 Club.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. As with all politicians...
it is easy to tell when he is lying, it is when his lips are moving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I_Make_Mistakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Tricky Ricky, Mr. devout Christian could never lie!
I (Clinton converted Dem) talked with one of a few family members that is a politically active Dem. and asked "How did Santorum get elected?". She said, "It was during the Clinton problems and our attention was diverted."

She promised me a couple of years ago, that they would get him out, and I am holding her to that promise. He is the scum of the Earth, and I can not see (sans Clinton issues) more than 20% voting for him. It is funny how the Pentagon base closing hit in states that are somewhat Repub representative. Let's see, if TR wins, it is Diebold rigged.

I also, want to state, that the states who won in their challenges to the original closing list, know they can no longer trust the Repub's either and many of them have a good Repub. representation.

This admin. doesn't get it, the Devil Is In The Details. They have screwed a lot of Blue area Repub's and the Piper always gets Paid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Shocking! Not Rick Santorum!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC