Tweety & Panel Apparently Deem Dem Primary In 2008 Unnecessary

[Dinger]

Talking about "Who can Beat Hillary?" and other bullshit. Boy, the pugs want her BAD!

Panelists: Clarence Paige, Kathleen Parker, Howard Fineman, and some British bitch (Katy Kay).

[AspenRose]

1. Yes, they certainly do

On edit: Katty Kay from the BBC?

I've long held her conservative views suspect when watching BBC World. Maybe this explains why she's not currently anchoring the broadcast.

[fob]

2. I only had to get to "kathleen parker" to get the full puke value of that

"panel".

BTW, it's Clarence, not Clearance

[Dinger]

3. Thanks, I Fixed It (nt)

[bobbieinok]

4. like in 1999 media had crowned W candidate and president

I wondered why 'we' 'needed' an election

of course, we didn't get an election; we got a sElection

[senseandsensibility]

7. Only this time

the selected candidate for the Dems will be a stooge to lose to the repuke. * was the crown prince of the haves, and installed into the presidency. Hillary is the opposite.

[Poiuyt]

5. They said the same thing about Howard Dean until the elections

[FreedomAngel82]

6. Why they want her bad?

Beats me. They think they can beat her easily. I think they underestimate her personally, but it really is quite interesting how they're obsessed with this. I haven't heard anybody on the left side talk about 2008 much. :shrug:

[CityDem]

8. Can I attend the coronation

We need a real debate in 2008 -- not some bullshit coronation. Those who voted for the Iraq war resolution need to explain to the party and to the american people how over 2000 service men and woman were sent to an early grave without a threat to our national security.

[wisteria]

9. The intelligence they were briefed on at the time stated there

was definitely WMD-Tennant said it was a "slam dunk". Voting on the Resolution just allowed Bush the right to make the decision to go to war. Many Dem's passionately voiced their concerns and pleaded with Bush about going to war without further inspections and without a strong coalition. Ultimately, Bush and company lied to our party leaders just like they lied to the American public. Suppose it was proven that Saddam actually had WMD and there was a plot to attack America. Suppose it did turn out that he did indeed have a hand in the 9/11 attacks. And just suppose, under those circumstances, our Dem leaders had voted to not allow Bush the authority he needed to wage a war, how do you think the American people would have reacted to our failure to help protect our country?

[DontBlameMe]

10. Uh, he'd be reelected?

Oh, shit! He was reelected! And none of your supposition's were true.

Go figure.