Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1st time ever household incomes failed to increase for five straight years

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 02:18 PM
Original message
1st time ever household incomes failed to increase for five straight years
Edited on Wed Aug-31-05 02:20 PM by dajoki
coincidence? i think not!! we aren't even feeling the effects of CAFTA yet. how about a LIVING WAGE, i doubt it. how about funding social programs for the poor, no just the opposite. tax cuts and loopholes for corporations and the wealthy, of course. and the middle class, what middle class? this administration has done more to seperate the rich from the poor than anyone in my lifetime.

NYThttp://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/31/national/31census.html?th&emc=th

U.S. Poverty Rate Was Up Last Year

By DAVID LEONHARDT
Published: August 31, 2005
WASHINGTON, Aug. 30 - Even as the economy grew, incomes stagnated last year and the poverty rate rose, the Census Bureau reported Tuesday. It was the first time on record that household incomes failed to increase for five straight years.

<<snip>>

The census's annual report card on the nation's economic well-being showed that a four-year-old expansion had still not done much to benefit many households. Median pretax income, $44,389, was at its lowest point since 1997, after inflation.

<<snip>>

After the report's release, Bush administration officials said that the job market had continued to improve since the end of 2004 and that they hoped incomes were now rising and poverty was falling. The poverty rate "is the last, lonely trailing indicator of the business cycle," said Elizabeth Anderson, chief of staff in the economics and statistics administration of the Commerce Department.

<<snip>>

But the biggest tax cuts went to high-income families already getting raises, Democrats said Tuesday. The report, they added, showed that the cuts had failed to stimulate the economy as the White House had promised.

"The growth in the economy is not going to families," said Senator Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island. "It's in stark contrast to what happened during the Clinton administration."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's another tipping point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. to borrow a phrase "mission acomplished"
the rich get there's and everybody elses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. you nailed it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. The New World Order has taken over......
I wonder how much more sh_t the American people will take before a revolution will begin to materialize???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yeah, how much more????
I am so angry at the folks who still support the moran-in-chief but I am even more angry at our 'opposition' party who sit silently by voting for repuke measures that hurt the middle class. They are equally guilty & equally bought out by corporate interests.

Revolution is the right word here, cuz regime change isn't going to make much difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. i lost faith in our party...
a long time ago. i can't pinpoint when, it is probably the years of dissapointment. waiting for someone to step up and no one will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I'm there too, dajoki.
Recently I filled out a voter registration change of affiliation form. I simply cannot support a party where a number of members vote contrary to the good of the middle & lower classes -- enough members to pass bad bills.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. i admire your principles...
i just don't think a third party could be viable at this point in time. maybe in the future? i don't know, as long as there is so much money changing hands in D.C. and so many politicians with their hands out, nothing will change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. we are just the sheep to them...
too many dumb fucks don't know any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Do they still count homeless as being part of our society or not?
Wonder what the real numbers are since any government statistic is now very problematic to put in politely?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. these guys are good at fixing numbers...
if you get my drift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC