Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Attorney's Porn Fight Gets Bad Review

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 07:23 PM
Original message
U.S. Attorney's Porn Fight Gets Bad Review
Obscenity Prosecution Task Force will focus on Internet crimes and peer-to-peer distribution of pornography.

Daily Business Review 8/30

When FBI supervisors in Miami met with new interim U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta last month, they wondered what the top enforcement priority for Acosta and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales would be.

Would it be terrorism? Organized crime? Narcotics trafficking? Immigration? Or maybe public corruption?

The agents were stunned to learn that a top prosecutorial priority for Acosta and the Dept of Justice was none of the above. Instead, Acosta told them, it's obscenity. Not pornography involving children, but pornographic material featuring consenting adults.

Acosta's stated goal of prosecuting distributors of adult porn has angered federal and local law enforcement officials, as well as prosecutors in his own office. They say there are far more serious issues in a high-crime area like South Florida, which is an international hub at risk for terror, money laundering, and other dangerous activities.

"Compared to terrorism, public corruption and narcotics, (pornography) is no worse than spitting on the sidewalk," said Stephen Bronis, a partner at Zuckerman Spaeder in Miami and chairman of the white-collar crime division of the American Bar Association. "With so many other problems afflicting America this is absolutely ridiculous.

(Article then goes on to discuss the influence of the American Family Association and other Christian conservatives, and how they have the Bush administration by the balls (so to speak) on this issue.

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1125318960389&rss=newswire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. They hate us for our kleenex. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's the first laugh I've had today.
You funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. fundies wasting more tax dollars n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC