Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Redstate.org: even the Repubs are disgusted with *

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 08:20 PM
Original message
Redstate.org: even the Repubs are disgusted with *
The absentee.
By: trevino · Section: GOP


The NYT's bizarre fantasies of being ravished by the Leader notwithstanding, there is a definitive public role for a President in these circumstances. Regrettably for that dwindling band among us who feel the Republic is strengthened by every inactive, hands-off officeholder, modern democracy demands that an elected representative involve himself in the great events of the day. At a bare minimum, he must appear informed and active, lest the perception of leaderlessness engender its own reality.
President Bush is failing to meet this minimum.

The President's lackluster afternoon address yesterday was followed by a truly disastrous Good Morning America interview this morning. (No video or transcript yet, but a BBC writeup is here.) In it, the President went from making the usual minor errors -- stating that the number of "missing" was unknown, when he probably meant the dead -- to making a truly stupefying one: stating that the breaching of the levees was an unforeseen event. This is simply false (see any of the usual left wing sites for copious sourcing), and it's such a basic error in this case as to suggest a real detachment from the situation at hand. New Orleans has been on borrowed times, behind insufficient levees, for decades; it's incredible that the President either does not know or will not acknowledge this.

What does this have to do with the relief and recovery effort per se? Very little. What does it have to do with the President's political fate? A great deal. Fairly or not, his perceived engagement with the de facto loss of a major American city is now the single most important issue affecting his second term agenda. It won't take long for many to make the connection that it's just this sort of de facto loss -- albeit to terrorism rather than natural disaster -- that his Administration has purportedly been preparing to handle since 9/11. That he seems disengaged, and that at the moment those purported preparations seem ephemeral indeed, together may well represent a ripping-away of the facade of the President-as-protector that won him reelection.

It's too early to know, of course. But for the sake of his agenda -- and really, for the sake of our refugee fellow-citizens -- the President needs to get on the ball.



www.redstate.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Woo hoo!
The Worst Lame Duck President Ever!
I think he owes the Political Capital Bank some back payments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, he got it in one.
George claimed to be the guy who could make sure we were protected from disaster...he didn't even bother to inform himself where the disasters would be coming from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why the hell don't they admit that Bush is not fit to be president and
Edited on Thu Sep-01-05 08:28 PM by Mountainman
never was. His hero worship after 9/11 was not earned. Anyone being in the White House would have done the same. Bush is a sock puppet and his puppet masters never really intended to have to govern in situations like this. Their motive from the start was to line their pockets from the public treasury and not to do anything like lead the everyday people.

It is the major fault of the media for propping them up for so long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. He won't get on the ball. He's behind the eight ball now.
And FUCK HIM!

I'd like to see the whole country flip him the finger. And then frog march his sorry ass off to JAIL!!!!!!!!

Visualize IMPEACHMENT!!!!!!!!!!!
Then go DO something about it!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hi-ball, maybe?

---------------------------------------------------------
Would Jesus love a liberal? You bet!
http://timeforachange.bluelemur.com/liberalchristians.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dem leaders, you have your meme: Bush is detached from Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. and furthermore
He is disengaged, and turns out NOT to be the President-as-Protector after all! (I'm shocked. Just shocked. :sarcasm:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. TOAST....BUSH is TOAST It took a long time but now the peeps
can really see the REAL DEAL....Bush is a kid, a dangerous Kid, who got daddy's guns out from the locker.....

"Flood? What Flood?" ................."I got Guns.....I got Big GUNS"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC