Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Holy Crap! Hillary Actually Has A Chance?!?!?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BamaLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 04:04 PM
Original message
Holy Crap! Hillary Actually Has A Chance?!?!?
If she can be neck-in-neck with the Republican nominee, then what could basically any other Democrat do? Oh my God! It would be a rout to run General Clark. . .
______________________________



Election 2008
John McCain (R) 40%
Hillary Clinton (D) 38%

RasmussenReports.com

Election 2008
Rudy Giuliani (R) 42%
Hillary Clinton (D) 39%

RasmussenReports.com


http://rasmussenreports.com/2005/Hillary%20McCain%20Rudy.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. If these three are our choices I guess I'd pick her.
That's how enthusiastic I am about it. I'll take someone who is at least not a raving psycho path.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fuck Hill and Bill, they are a disgrace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Bush is the disgrace
Keep your eyes on the real culprit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inthebrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Bush aint running in 2008
It doesnt matter. After the events of this week It's obvious the country is starving for new leadership anyway. Bush just defeated himself and I doubt people will forget this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larissa238 Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. And there is a new TV show
with a woman president coming out in the fall, to try and get the country used to the idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. don't do it Hillary!
We'll have 8 more years of bushco like crap. Bank on it.

She is a lightening rod for the right. Give her a shot and every single republican will come out of the woodwork just to vote against her. all of them, the moderates, the 'independents', the cons, the neocons. Hillary will unite them like we've never seen before.

And besides, can't we do better than a DLC shill? come on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And you don't any other Dem would bring them out?
That'll happen no matter who our nominee is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I would cast my ballot for her or any other Dem....way better than the PUB
Predators....das fer sure....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Too many DUers have bought the conventional wisdown
about Hillary, that she "can't win." I don't know if she's going to run, but why so many DUers ape GOP talking points about her is beyond me.

Other polls shows Hillary doing well, too, much better than Kerry, for instance. I haven't seen any with Clark (whom I like a lot).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Actually I have seen no match ups with Clark
Edited on Fri Sep-02-05 05:19 PM by karynnj
and the last one I saw with hillary/McCain had a Kerry/ McCain too - they were nearly identical. One of them was one point higher - which is not significant. The polls where Hillary is shown ahead of Kerry are primary type polls of who do you want to win.

This is also way to early. Also, both Kerry and Hillary have been thoroughly examined by the other side and their negatives are known.

Guilliani has many negatives that no one outside NY seems to know. Telling the press you are divorcing your wife to marry your mistress BEFORE you tell your wife, should cut into the number of votes he gets from women and it will be hard to be the values candidate.

McCain is thought to be a clean campaign champion - but has a Pac, that is suppose to be about clean campaigns that received about $200,000 from CableVision (before he supported a measure that was of benefit to them in the Senate) - but it is really about promoting McCain , skirting McCain/ Feingold. He was also one of the Keating 5 S&L scandal. That and being a maverick is compromised when you kiss and hug Bush as often as he does.

Both of them will likely have their negatives raised by their primary. Kerry would likely have his negatives go down - because they always have when people see him, which they would in a primary season if he is winning. (if he's not, his negatives don't matter) Hillary's negatives and positives are hard to predict, because her current stature seems built on her connection to Bill and star status more than her accomplishments or positions.

Clark has the advantage of possibly being a new face, while having learned from 2004. He was in the primary for such a short time that there are probably many (in the general public) who have no real memory of his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. That's because....
The pollsters won't include Clark in any head-to-head matchups.

And as I've said all along, the problem isn't that Hillary "can't win." She could win a narrow electoral college victory with all the blue states + Ohio or Florida.

But she would mobilize the right-wing base en masse, especially in red states - - and Democratic candidates further down the ticket would feel that sting in the red states.

Hillary could be elected president...but there's no way in hell we'd ever see a Democratic U.S. Senate majority elected alongside her in '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Am I alone in not giving a flying fuck about this stuff right now
Seems so trivial at the moment, what with Katrina and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC