Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another stupid, simplistic remark from Rush Limbaugh

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bullshot Donating Member (807 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 08:21 AM
Original message
Another stupid, simplistic remark from Rush Limbaugh
Edited on Sun Sep-04-05 08:34 AM by Bullshot
In his daily blurb aired in the early morning on our local station, America's favorite dope addict was railing against the "environmental whackos" for preventing us from being independent from foreign oil.

Slimeball noted that there is a 400-500 year supply of oil in the U.S. in the form of shale. But the "whackos" have put up such a fight that the oil companies are unable to extract the oil from the shale.

Well, this morning I heard a radio program guest address the issue of oil extraction from shale. He stated that it takes so much energy to heat the shale in order to extract oil from it, that you're spending more energy than you would get from the oil itself.

When I heard this, I figured it's another example of Limpballs blathering and not knowing what he's talking about. And that's been the foundation of his entire show and the dildoheads who follow him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. remember that Limpballs and his fans
are anti-science. They'd call the shale export a "liberal whacko" and demand that we go on with shale extraction anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. They want us to give subsidies to oil companies to produce oil from shale
and then let the companies sell it for top dollar and keep all the proceeds.'

It's the corporate agenda at work. Start defining the "problem", get the taxpayer money to the corporations to solve the "problem", let the corporations rip off the taxpayer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Aren't those drugs he takes degenerative?
I only heard Limbaugh once, over the summer, but I, too, noticed he wasn't making sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntieM1957 Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Precisely how was that different from any other occasion? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Do you know how long he's been popping the pills?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntieM1957 Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. I really don't care what he ingests - it is what he extrudes
that I find offensive - and ALWAYS HAVE.

It's never been logical, never made sense.

How anyone could follow his freeform flow of nonsense if beyond me.

I've had many try to convince that I should listen, if only to know what "the other side" is saying. But he just doesn't make sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nah. I once listened to him in 1993. Didn't make sense then either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. How do you know he wasn't heavily medicated back in '93?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. Believe it. If oil companies could get oil from shale deposits and
make a profit, they would be doing it. Rush just makes it up and his listeners buy it.........hook, line, and sinker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. Is this oil extraction from shale causing even more enviromental damage...
then drilling? I don't know that much about it.

Of course, why am I worrying over whether Limbaugh would consider the environmental impact. Silly me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justgamma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. We could turn our cars into Stanley Steamers! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. As always, the #1 priority of these jerks is hanging onto every last cent.
When it comes to neocons, they couldn't care less about the environment if it means saving a penny now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. That's been the entire foundation of the Republican party
pretending they are experts in fields in which they have ZERO knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Is Rush still saying Global Warming is a MYTH???
There is so much evidence he has had to change his mind/stance/position...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aTm_exrugger Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. Proof Positive Rush Doesn't know a damn thing.
If he is talking about drilling, we already extract gas from shale -Look up Barnett Shale. I am pretty sure it is done in eastern oklahoma, ohio, among other places. The barnett shale also contains some oil zones near wichita falls, tx. Nobody goes for it because it is not economical to produce. The reason being is because of permeability (interconnectedness of the pores of the rock). Shale is for all intents and purposes impermiable. (they can extract the gas because of the small molecular size and the large fractures within the rock.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
koopie57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think we should
shove limpballs into the levee and plug the hole. Finally put the big fat pig to some good use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesTee Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Amen, Brutha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. My husband works for an oil co.-TOO EXPENSIVE to extract from shale
but it's just about economic now, given the price of oil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. No really, it's cutting edge, it's called "ditology" .
All you have to do is repeat what he says often enough and then that fixes the energy crisis. I don't know why your always denigrating science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. Can't wait till that shithead "relapses" and ODs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MojoXN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. Well, if you're going to be a narrow-minded blowhard...
It ALWAYS helps to not know what the hell you're talking about.

MojoXN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. I have a better idea,Rush has empty land ALL around his estate...
Edited on Sun Sep-04-05 07:57 PM by OneTwentyoNine
Unless your a fucking HYPOCRITE you'll allow a refinery to be built on one of those lots Rush.

You rich dicks always try and paint the "wacko Liberal" scenario for why refineries aren't being built but the truth is that you and your ilk don't want them within a 100 MILES of where you live so YOU block their construction using high priced lawyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC