Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Either Chertoff Lied, Or He's Grossly Incompetent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 12:44 AM
Original message
Either Chertoff Lied, Or He's Grossly Incompetent
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, discussing the federal response to Hurricane Katrina on national television, offered a defense that was almost certainly a lie -- and if true suggests gross incompetence.

Let's review. During a lengthy back-and-forth with Tim Russert on the Sept. 4 edition of NBC's <em>Meet the Press</em>, there was this exchange:

RUSSERT: There's a CD which is in your department and the White House has it and the president, and you are saying, "We were surprised that the levees may not hold." How could this be?

CHERTOFF: No, Tim, I have to tell you, that's not what I said. You have to listen to what I said. What I said was not that we didn't anticipate that there's a possibility the levees will break. What I said is in this storm, what happened is the storm passed and passed without the levees breaking on Monday. Tuesday morning, I opened newspapers and saw headlines that said "New Orleans Dodged The Bullet," which surprised people.

There are two major problems with Chertoff's response, a variation of which he offered on CNN later in the day:

First, are we to believe that the person in charge of managing the federal response to Katrina got his information from newspaper headlines? Are we to believe that Chertoff was not in contact with FEMA Director Michael Brown, or emergency personnel on the ground in New Orleans, at some point late Monday night or early Tuesday morning?

The levees broke last Monday night, and by 1:30 a.m. Tuesday morning, CNN was reporting that a two-block breach had occurred in the 17th Street Canal. If you were watching CNN at the time, you'll recall that the anchor was interviewing a hospital director who was describing water rising by one foot every five minutes. The phone interview was repeated throughout the night.

So are we to believe that no one contacted Chertoff at, say, 2 a.m. or 3 a.m., to inform him that the levee had breached and the city was rapidly flooding? Are we to believe no one said, "Michael, turn on CNN"? Are we to believe that the Homeland Security Secretary actually got his news the following morning from newspaper headlines?

It's unfathomable. Chertoff's response to Russert should have been "Tuesday morning, I opened newspapers and saw headlines that said "New Orleans Dodged The Bullet," which surprised me, because I knew the headline was dead wrong."

And that brings us to the second thing that is wrong with his statement.

The amazing thing about the Internet is that you can check things like a headline. One question the media had following Chertoff's interview with Russert was "Which newspaper?" No one could figure it out.

The reason? Well, consider that Newseum has 477 archived front pages from Aug. 30 -- and none of them have anything close to "New Orleans Dodged The Bullet."

I gave Chertoff the benefit of the doubt. Maybe he read the headline on-line. Or maybe he, like the president, gets a daily briefing gathered by a staffer, which would include print-outs from the Internet of stories around the country.

Sure enough, following a Google search, I found a couple of headlines that fit the bill. The conservative website World Net Daily ran a story on Aug. 29 -- that would be Monday, not Tuesday -- with the headline, "Hurricane slams ashore, N'Orleans dodges bullet."

Then there was the Grenada (as in the island) Daily Star, which ran an Associated Press story on Aug. 29 -- again Monday, not Tuesday -- under the headline, "Big Easy dodges bullet."

I found one other headline, from a story filed at 11:37 a.m. central time, in QuickDFW, the on-line version of a free weekly for residents of the Dallas-Fort Worth area, under the headline,"New Orleans dodges another bullet." But clearly this story and headline shouldn't have run -- the levee had broken 10 hours earlier.

Now, to find even these obscure stories, I had to search through several dozen choices on Google, and use two searches -- one with the words "Katrina" "Dodged" "Bullet," and another using "Dodges" instead of "Dodged."

Even giving Chertoff the benefit of the doubt -- that he didn't "open newspapers," but instead either went on-line, or received a briefing that had a summary of the headlines of the day -- are we to believe that Chertoff actually found these headlines? And furthermore, that he would believe those headlines, having received no other information from FEMA Director Brown, other emergency personnel, or by simply watching television news coverage?

Simply put, there are only two options:

a) Chertoff lied to Russert and the American people

b) Chertoff presented a storyline to suggest that he was out-of-touch with the situation, out-of-contact with appropriate sources of information, and thus grossly incompetent heading the federal response.


***

But wait, it gets worse.

Chertoff's fictional headline -- the presumptive lie he told the American people -- has been repeated, several times, in the days that followed.

-- General Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, used the talking point at a press conference. He wrongly said "most of the papers" had the headline on Tuesday.

-- Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld used the talking point in an interview with the Sean Hannity radio show. Rumsfeld told Hannity that the federal response was confused because of the misleading newspaper headlines -- headlines that didn't exist.

-- GOP matinee idol (and California Congressman) David Dreier used the talking point in an interview with the BBC.

How can this be? How can a canard become a talking point? Because now, on top of the Homeland Security Secretary, the Secretary of Defense and others, you have conservative talk radio and the right-wing of the blogosphere trying to convince people of this lie. And an illogical lie at that.

This is reason enough for an independent commission to investigate the Katrina response, rather than the Republican-led effort that is proceeding.

***

This article first appeared at Journalists Against Bush's B.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. IMO, he is grossly incompetent, and because of that, he lied. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Extend a Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. both n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Michael Jerkoff should be ridden out of town on a rail.
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 12:49 AM by ocelot
He's an incompetent political hack who should be cleaning cages at the dog pound.

And he's a seriously creepy-looking dude, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pam-Moby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Do you guys remember hearing from the rethugs
about the mis-information minister in Iraq? Well we may just have the same thing going on here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. Let's just take a step back
Let's not make this an "either/or" decision. I, for one, believe he lied and is grossly incompetent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Sure
You can choose both, i.e. he lied to America, and did so to cover up his gross incompetence.

Maybe he can get a job judging Arabian horses. I hear he has an "in."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I was agreeing with ladylibertee, but now that you mention it
there is a third choice:
1. He lied;
2. He is grossly incompetent; and
3. He lied to cover up his gross incompetence

I think each of these choices to be true. They build on each other.

In fact, I think I can safely say that from day one anything he has said or will say about himself or his job performance can be covered by the above three statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladylibertee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. Either Chertoff Lied, Or He's Grossly Incompetent. Well,
I say, he is both.I think Chertoff is a grossly Incompetent retard who also lies.He also looks like a drowned rat. hahahahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Welcome to DU, ladylibertee.
He's not a retard. I have a niece who's developmentally disabled, and she's a lovely and compassionate person.

But incompetent - oh, yeah. And a liar. And despicable. And looks to me like a death's head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladylibertee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Let's be POLITICALLY Correct here....
Sweetheart, I would never insult a person who is developmentally disabled by calling them a retard. A retard is a person who looks like they should be competent but choose to be WARPED in the brain.I apologize if this misunderstanding offended you, but I hope now you understand I did not use the word retard in the context you thought.I will always call the right....RETARDICANS because they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. Chertoff is lying. Chertoff is wrong. Chertoff needs to go. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. Nagin asked HS/FEMA on Monday to send Helicopters
to drop sandbags on the 17th St Levee which was starting to show signs of an imminent breach.

HS/FEMA told him Black Hawks were on the way. Then a few hours later when they didn't show up, they told him the helicopters had been diverted to picked up people stranded at another location.

Amazing Chertoff didn't know about any of this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
13. Same could be said of entire * administration.............

my intuition says it's lies, lies, lies. Even things that start off as incompetence get "spun" and become lies. That's all they seem to know. Lie to manipulate to begin with, then lie to cover up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. the sad thing is ...
... the conservative blogosphere and conservative talk radio gladly take things that are likely untrue -- like the fake headlien, or the illogical story that Chertoff told Russert -- and repeat them over and over.

You realize that, among those paying attention to the unfolding storyline in New Orleans, maybe 35-40% of Americans believe the Chertoff/Rumsfeld/Meyers/Dreier/Brown line about the newspaper headlines they read, and will defend it as fact?

That's why, even on things this obvious, it's an uphill climb for Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC