Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is with your nation's in-ability to comply with NAFTA rulings?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 02:26 AM
Original message
What is with your nation's in-ability to comply with NAFTA rulings?
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 02:28 AM by HEyHEY
NAFTA has ruled in Canada's favour on Softwood lumber many times, as has the WTO... yet, we get fucked
Seriously. I can't wait, Canada is in serious favour to rip nafta up and shove it up Mulroney's ass (because no one like it to begin with).
And what does Bushco say, fuck all! Because they don't we'll do it. And I can't figure it out. The country that's all about capitalism keeps fucking us over on this one.

And this ISN'T flamebait, before some prat who lives tobe indignant alerts on me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would like more info or links.....I know very little about this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. See, exactly, is US media even covering this? NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Didn't you get the memo?
The US "mainstream" media never covers anything that is less than friendly toward US policy.

We have to catapult the propaganda, dontcha know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. NAFTA is unconstitutional
It was a treaty, and was not ratified by a 2/3 majority in the Senate.

Hence, I do not consider it to be binding law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You signed the fucking thing
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 02:38 AM by HEyHEY
Do you sing a deal on a house you don't consider to be binding?
YOUR constituion doesn't apply Canada, but your signature does

'
(Bluestate, we may be in a slight flamewar here, but I dig you man)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Don't look at me. I didn't sign the damned thing. *grumble grumble*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bee Donating Member (894 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. lol
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. When you find a way to get through to our
president let us know will ya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. LOOK, we've bought every colouring book on the market!
what else can we do! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. You forgot My Pet Goat !
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nine23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. HEyHEY, You up late drinking again, cruisin' for a scrap?
The President of China is here on a visit, having serious trade talks and signing deals. Personally, I've been waiting for this moment all my life, ie. diversifying our economy, re-purposing our relationship with the US, etc. We're essentially doing what everybody else in the world is doing in that respect anyway.

Besides, the softwood lumber thing will probably work itself out anyway, once people down south realize it'll be costing them billions extra in illegal tariffs as they're rebuilding the Gulf Coast. (I know, it sounds harsh and opportunistic to speak that way in times like these, but let's face it: Bush can't do anything unless it's RE-ACTING to any given crisis, as he's proved over and over again. It's all he knows how to do. He's such an immature leader/statesman, he doesn't even know what the term proactive means.)

Hell, there were players in the BC lumber industry who were even considering GIVING the Gulf States FREE lumber/plywood/particle board for the rebuilding effort last week, until they found out the US Feds would STILL be charging illegal tariffs - ON A FUCKING GIFT! (Yet another example of them unable to admit they're, in fact, dickheads. Now THAT'S a story which should be getting out there, but the timing is not quite right.)

And you're absolutely correct about NAFTA. Tear it up, and shove up Mulroney's ass. He's the only major signatory left around who's directly responsible. (Reagan's dead, and even if he WAS alive, he wouldn't remember signing it...). Just tear it up; no trade war - it's not even necessary - just shred the fucking thing.

Do you follow the stock market? We have the hottest economy in the western hemisphere. It's showtime...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elare Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I believe the US has agreed to drop the tariff on free lumber
I can't remember where I read that; possibly in my local newspaper or perhaps in The Globe & Mail.

Regardless, the US should live up to the agreements it signs. I'm personally hoping that our forestry industries will find new markets in Asia & Europe ... screw the US ... let 'em beg for our lumber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. No they haven't done so
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 03:14 PM by HEyHEY
Or wait, maybe they have...how long go was that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elare Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. I did read it in my local paper
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. My Interpretation
From the article is A bit different.

The OFIA proposal, which Lim said will be presented to International Trade Minister Jim Peterson, would see the federal government purchase quantities of Canadian-produced lumber and provide it free to the United States.

The U.S. Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports, the group which has lobbied for tariffs to be imposed against Canadian-produced softwood, said last week the group would agree to drop tariffs on any lumber donated by Canadian producers to the U.S.

http://www.chroniclejournal.com/story.shtml?id=28823

Appears to be saying that if the company donates it they would not raise a big fuss. But it also appears that the producer group wants the government to purchase it and provide it.

So seems to be a disconnect.

Plus I find it hard to have the government provide free lumber to some company like Halliburton that will just end up charging a big mark up for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
strategery blunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. Let me explain something...
The only reason why we came up with NAFTA involved certain CEO's desire to make OMG ALL UR $$$$ BELONG TO US.

But when you claimed to be treated unfairly, you pi$$ed Weyerhaeuser off.

Weyerhaeuser execs=have mores=bu$h*'s base

Now, do you see?

















:puke:



(Oh, on a lighter note, I worked plenty of overtime this summer, which means I get to go to a bunch of hockey games:evilgrin:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oakland Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
10. Only good for Mexico - maybe
NAFTA and CAFTA are both bad deals for countries that are not third world. The US, unlike Europe, put together trading blocs with poor countries and said - don't worry, we'll come down to your level. Europse on the other hand said: If you want to trade with us, bring up your levels of environmental protection, wages, etc. It's just us ugly Americans doing our thing again. You ought to know by now not to trust us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Hi Oakland!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. HEyHEY. It's cus were Merikans and caint be wrong. So your rong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. If NAFTA is not respected fairly, it's really no good.
Please don't blame me, blame Mr. Bush (the occupant) of the White House. I voted for President Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. No! No! No! You don't understand. Free trade is only free trade when
WE get the dough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC