Do you agree with forced evacuations?
Sparkly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:12 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Do you agree with forced evacuations? |
|
Do you agree with forcing people out of their homes if they refuse to leave?
|
skids
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:23 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Neither. Yes or no doesn't cut it. |
|
I think Nagin and others could quash this controversy if they exempted particular parishes from the evac order (those where power is back and things were never flooded and there is no drastic impending hazard.) The only good reason to evac those areas is to cut down on the need for fire/police service there.
|
M155Y_A1CH
(921 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think a person who makes a private decision to defy the government's order should relinquish the right to make later claims against the government.
|
barb162
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. for every time I hear "I lived through Camille" and then they stayed |
|
when they had the means to leave, I wish I had a dollar. And I wish they had to reimburse the government for their rescue.
|
FormerDittoHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The White House? Absolutely! n/t |
PublicWrath
(597 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 12:57 PM by PublicWrath
Many neighborhoods without any damage at all are being pressured to evacuate. The residents interviewed say that they are fully provisioned and want to wait it out because they believe their houses will be demolished or looted (perhaps even by police) if they leave.
Authorities have been telling residents who refuse to evacuate that they must be measured for body bags. Resident chuckled and said they know body bags only come in one size.
|
DuaneBidoux
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
5. If no then people should not expect emergency services when they get into |
|
trouble. It is not fair to the emergency workers to force them to go back and risk their lives when people were clearly warned to get out because of the danger. This has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with the safety of those putting their lives on the line to help people.
|
liberal43110
(687 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Moreover, letting a small amount of people stay actually INCREASES the risks for many types of problems. I think looking at this in a COLLECTIVE way is very progressive.
|
1932
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I believe in discovering why they don't want to leave and addressing those |
barb162
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message |
8. yeah, for the simple reason that rescuers are endangered |
|
trying to save the lives of people. Helicopter rescue is dangerous and rescue in general is dangerous.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Jan 13th 2025, 04:29 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.