Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

George Washington wanted A DEPARTMENT OF PEACE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 08:38 AM
Original message
George Washington wanted A DEPARTMENT OF PEACE
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_emily_ho_050902_george_washington_wa.htm

George Washington wanted A DEPARTMENT OF PEACE

by Emily Horswill

http://www.opednews.com

WITH A SIGH,THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES dipped his pen in the ink well.

He looked at the draft for a Department of War lying before him. “No,” he said, “First we need a Department of Peace. If we are going to develop expertise only in War, that is what we will have.” But the Congress of 1776 had a new nation to set up. The DOP, although resurrected occasionally, has largely rested in the shadows for 300 years.

Instead, we have fought war following on the heels of wars. We have "improved" on horrible weapons, napalm, poison gas, the cancer producing DU nuclear weapons, cluster bombs, declared illegal and immoral by our own courts, and are using allot destroy a civilization with the utmost brutality in the horror war of horrors.

But in September 2005, at the Department of Peace Convention, Congressman Dennis Kucinich will lay HB1673, requesting a Department of Peace before Congress.
He is asking for 2 per cent of the military budget. Under it, our Peace Academy will offer four years of education. Graduates will be sent to work with
communities here and abroad with the focus on rooting out causes of violence.
At home, The Academy also intends to pioneer teaching alternatives to hitting Johnnie over the head with a pencil box starting in pre-school.

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. the party of hate will reject it along with many dinos IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. War is money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yay Dennis!



Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Too Little Too Late:: To be effective:: The Y Factor must/should be
implemented....

Peace should be made a no brainer......The Y and the How is available, its the "MOMOTERIUM" reaching a Level of success thats missing....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. 210 years and 146 bills later...
George Washington introduced a Department of Peace bill into Congress in 1793. The African American freeman Benjamin Banneker, a brilliant astronomer, mathematician and surveyor of the future Washington, D.C. wrote in his 1792 Almanac about a Department of Peace to “balance” the Department of War. Banneker’s friends, like Dr. Benjamin Rush and Thomas Jefferson liked the idea. Yet 210 years and 146 bills later, we still have no Department of Peace and no US Peace Academy.


http://www.georgiapeace.org/Department%20of%20Peace.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HR_Pufnstuf Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have the simple solution.
Nationalize the defense industry like the space industry (NASA).

Build only what we need to defend ourselves.

Take the profit out of war (and rebuilding).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Two new heroesfor me - Washington and Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hmmm.
In 1984, the "Ministry of Peace" is responsible for the prosecution of the endless bloody warfare necessary to keep the proles in line.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. So when does Rove start with the 'anti-George Washington' campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomUser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. This will never happened under the current adminstration
If it does happen, going by Bush's past history of incompetence, he'll probably appoint Rummy or Richard Perle or Wolfowitz to head the Department of Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Look who they appointed to the Department of Labor
Does that mean there shouldn't be a Department of Labor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomUser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yes, look at it
Do you honestly think Bush would create a Department of Labor if one didn't exist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nominated. Thank you for the history lesson.
I had thought Dennis Kucinich's HR was a new idea, who wudda thunk GW and TJ were supporters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I have no idea if any of the inspiration for this came
from the Native Americans (as many of the founder's ideas did)
but there were tribes who had both peace and war chiefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. Actually, it was never a formal piece of legislation
Washington did think it was a good idea though. It was discussed in Banneker's Almanac.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC