Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WAIT A SECOND!!!!!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DenaliDemocrat Donating Member (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 11:25 AM
Original message
WAIT A SECOND!!!!!!!!
As the spin machine turns, I now here Republicans blaming DEMOCRATS for confirming Brown.

I say WAIT A SECOND!!!

It is the PRESIDENT's job to MAKE POLITICAL APPOINTEES!! If he cannot be trusted enough to appoint people who have at a MINIMUM the education and experience to make them at LEAST QUALIFIED for the job, he must go. He cannot be trusted. He cannot hold his position.

Also, every damned time the Democrats balk at a political appointee of Bush, the Right-Wingers call them OBSTRUCTIONISTS (see Janice Rogers Brown) VENDICTIVE AND PUNITIVE.

Bush is a failure who cannot even nominate qualified people, and the media has crippled the opposition from the left. It is NOT our fault!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
choicevoice Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Democrats need to take this and run with it
Lots of nominations coming up. The Dem's need to say that they can no longer take information given by the nominee as factual or credible and that it's their job to investigate all aspects of the nominees credentials. They need to state that they can no longer assume that individuals put up for nomination by the President are qualified for the position and it is their responsibility to our country to make sure an appointee is up for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly.
They took Bush's word for WMD, too. Now, the untruthfulness of the White House has forced Congress into a more careful scrutiny of all White House statements, nominees, and resumes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not only do they need to bring this up on current nominees...
they need to make examples of the Browns, and the Boltons, and review the qualifications of other apointees in crucial positions (starting with FEMA and Homeland Security). Democrats need to make an example of how "giving the President the apointees he wants" and "a simple up or down vote" are not necesarily the best option. Democrats inthe House and Senate also need to make this the example of WHY we need to get all of the information on these nominees, and why reports and should not be withheld from the Whitehouse. I honestly think that I've had better background checks done on me upon hire at a non-profit, than the Head of FEMA or the UN Ambassador!! This is pathetic! If we use this as an example, the Republicans can't poo-poo our requests because the Media will (now) back us. Most of the Main stream media (sans Faux) has been wanting Brown's head on a platter for the past 2 weeks and railing on his incompetence has been their favorite talking point. Democrats need to use this to our advantage now, before another fairhaired American Co-ed turns up missing in Aruba.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC