Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Obama have answered the question with YES or NO?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 12:12 PM
Original message
Should Obama have answered the question with YES or NO?
Question from George Stephonopolous:

Did Howard Dean go over the line in saying Roberts doesn't have the heart for the job? (paraphrasing Dean - If someone has the exact quote, please post)

He wove a complicated answer of NO, but it took about 2 minutes of his vital DEM voice segment. Say NO move on to indict the bastard bush*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dean's exact words.
Did not hear Obama.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0509/09/sitroom.02.html

DEAN: My point is that John Roberts has a record. John Roberts appears to be a wonderful, decent, family person, but, again, we get back to the question about whether you really care and whether you have compassion. It's not enough to say you care.

It's what you've done. John Roberts' legal career has been about taking away every protection for young girls and women who want to participate in sports, for African-Americans and Hispanics, who want the equal same right to vote as everybody else, for taking away for women who believe they should determine what kind of health care they have, instead of having politicians do it.

His entire legal career appears to be about making sure those folks don't have the same rights everybody else does. That's probably not the right thing to do two weeks after a disaster, where certain members of society clearly did not have the same protections that everybody else did because of their circumstances. Americans are fair people and they want a sense of justice. I know Judge Roberts loves the law. I'm not sure he loves the American people.

BLITZER: So should the Senate reject his confirmation?

DEAN: Based on what I know now, absolutely, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank you Madfloridian! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. We need to teach every elected Democrat the fine art of saying NO
and YES.

When they explain, the message is lost.

He should have said simply, "no."

Let the "journalists" follow-up, that's their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Rabble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. How come no-one "gets" this?
Are we the only people that recognize that being clear and concise is quite literally the most important aspect of public life?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Oh how I wish they could lock you in a room with all our Dems, one by one,
so you could instill this into their heads! If they answered with a simple yes or no, it's not as if they wouldn't get a chance to explain their answer afterwards either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I wish that too; I'm known for my persuasive powers! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think he should have said clearly he agreed with Dean
Edited on Sun Sep-11-05 12:47 PM by Mass
before he started to explain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I totally agree...just say yes or no for the folks who communicate
in simple and straightforward ways. Christ - how difficult can it be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I guess one of the first things he learned in Senate Orientation School
was the art of quibbling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I think so too.
But I have got to say that I was much more pleased with Obama today than I have been since he was sworn in as Senator. At least today he didn't distance himself from Dean; he did not allow a wedge to be shoved in the Democratic Party. Maybe there is still hope for him ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes, he should have.
I voted for Obama and was proud and pleased to do so.

Having said that, Obama's appearance with Stephonopolous was more an exercise in how to be politically cautious than anything else.

It was difficult to know what he truly felt or thought about any issue discussed.

It feeds into the Republican argument that Dems stand for nothing, and with today's appearance, Obama proved that it is not an easily dismissed argument. Very disappointing.

My hope is that Obama in the future will at least leave a clear message behind after his appearances. Or at very least one that goes beyond the impression that he is planning on being all things to all people in hopes of being a president. If Obama has figured out a way to appeal to everyone, he has yet to actually make that work for him.

A gentle lawyerly response is still an avoidance of questions. The "Atticus Finch" approach to politics is not what is needed from major leaders in these forceful, frantic times where the opposition has treats us as the enemy camp for decades.

Sen. Obama is in grave danger of becoming irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Let us know as soon as you figure out how to push the toothpast back into
the tube!

It is done.

Can't undo it.

Obama and all other democrats should remember the one rule that will help us win:

NEVER EVER SAY ANYTHING NICE ABOUT A REPUKE!

Never!

If you are tempted, just KEEP YOUR FUCKIN MOUTH SHUT!

All any "undecided" (braindead) voter remembers is "hey - THEY like the repuke - THEY even compliment him all the time! - why shouldn't I vote for THEM? This proves the repukes can't be all that bad!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I would amend this
Don't say anything nice about the repuke agenda and their policies.

Don't even mention individual repukes except the obvious -- rove, bush, delay, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howmad1 Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. One thing I'll give to Obama......
He sure learned silver tounged political speak in a hurry. Only takes about 1/2 sec. to say NO! Frankly, I was quite disappointed in the interview. I was expecting a bit of a firebrand and got a mealy mouthed wus instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC