|
Edited on Mon Sep-12-05 12:40 PM by Jack Rabbit
Clinton was not one of our truly great presidents, but that's a long ways from saying that he was an utter failure. One could point to the fact that he did little or nothing to prepare for peak oil or that the levees around New Orleans weren't repaired while he was in office. I've heard right wing partisans scream that the September 11 attacks were Clinton's fault because he "let" Osama get away on more than one occasion.
That doesn't change the fact that Clinton left office five years ago. For five years, Bush has failed to development of alternate energy that would ease US dependence of fossil fuels and the upward pressure on energy prices. For five years, Bush has been more concerned about giving the federal budget surplus to his corporate cronies than with funding infrastructure maintenance. Finally, even if Clinton failed to get Osama, it doesn't change the fact that, while Clinton at least went after him, it wasn't even a priority with Bush until after September 11; we can't even be sure it's a priority with Bush now.
Clinton's record as president is a red herring. Bush is a disaster and bears responsibility for what has happened on his watch.
|