|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 08:05 AM Original message |
Can Cheney be impeached concurrently with Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
1. What would that do give us Hassert, Rice?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shipwack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 08:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. My eyes, Tesla, my eyes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
2. Yes - the entire cabinet can, I believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 08:27 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Article II Section 4: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 08:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I love people who dream big... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 09:25 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. thanks!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
3waygeek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 08:18 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. A couple months back... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
4. A Democratic-controlled House might impeach but no Repukes in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 08:29 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Not true. I understand he's support from the Republicans too.n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 08:38 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. What makes you think we won't have 2/3 after '06? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 09:01 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Repukes will continue to rubber-stamp his every nominee, budget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magnolia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
11. Personally... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
12. It takes 67 votes in the senate to impeach...We have 45 Democratic votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 07:24 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Good point. Thanks for that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC