Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Granny D says: "Stop that Rider!"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 11:17 PM
Original message
Granny D says: "Stop that Rider!"
by email

Friends,

Who was it who said that Democracy is a verb?

You can't sit down for a minute these days!

A rider to a U.S. Senate bill would, if passed, make a mockery of the
Senate's past efforts on Campaign Finance Reform.

Friend John Parker sent along an alert that just came out a few minutes ago from the League of Women Voters. I pasted it below and hope you will take a minute to click on the link to give your Senators a rattle.

Love,

Doris

http://capwiz.com/lwv/issues/alert/?alertid=8019476


ACTION ALERT: STOP A NEW CAMPAIGN FINANCE LOOPHOLE
September 14, 2005

Senate leaders have slipped a new fundraising loophole into the
Transportation, Treasury, HUD and General Government Appropriations bill that is expected on the floor of the Senate this week, the week of September 14.

Please contact your Senators immediately and urge them to vote for an
amendment by Senators John McCain (R AZ) and Russ Feingold (D WI) to
remove the Leadership PAC rider from the bill. Enter your zip code above to take action now!

The rider would allow Leadership Political Action Committees (PACs)
controlled by Members of Congress to transfer an unlimited amount of their funds (instead of the current $15,000 annual limit) to national party committees, which could then spend the funds on the Members’ campaigns. In so doing, the rider would open a new loophole, evading the limits that were enacted by Congress to protect citizens against corruption and the appearance of corruption in government.

The loophole-opening rider is explicitly written so that it is
available to congressional incumbents only, thereby providing an enormous and
discriminatory financial advantage for congressional incumbents over
their challengers.

The rider would not only greatly increase the influence of big-money
contributors with Senators and Representatives and provide a huge unfair advantage for incumbents; it also has absolutely no place as part of an appropriations bill and would set an extremely dangerous precedent for all kinds of additional back-door riders to be added to other appropriations bills to unravel campaign finance laws.

At a time when the suffering of millions of Americans needs to be
alleviated, the Senate should not be focusing its attention on increasing by eight-fold the amount that congressional incumbents – and not their challengers – can raise to support their campaigns.

Take action today to repeal this rider that would undo campaign finance reforms!

ACTION NEEDED

1. Contact your Senators now, by phone and by email, and urge them to
vote for the McCain-Feingold amendment to strip the loophole-opening
Leadership PAC rider from the Senate Transportation Appropriations bill. Phone calls can be made through the Capitol Hill switchboard at
202-224-3121 or 202-225-3121. Or, go to the League of Women Voters website and send them an electronic message: http://capwiz.com/lwv/issues/alert/?alertid=8019476

2. Send this email alert to other concerned citizens—your grassroots
network, your friends and coworkers. Encourage them to contact their
Senators today!

BACKGROUND

Under existing laws, Members of Congress are required to have separate campaign committees to pay for their re-election activities and cannot legally spend any of their Leadership PAC funds on their own campaigns. This rule ensures that limits on contributions to a Member’s campaign cannot be circumvented by giving additional contributions through the Member’s Leadership PAC to support the Member’s campaign. (Leadership PAC funds are typically used to fund travel or to make contributions to other Members’ campaigns.)

For example, under existing laws, an individual can give a Senator
$2,100 for his primary election and $2,100 for his general election, or a total of $4,200 to support the Senator’s own campaign. The same
individual also can give $5,000 each year, or $30,000 over the Senator’s six-year term, to the Senator’s Leadership PAC. But these Leadership PAC funds cannot be spent on the Senator’s campaign.

If the Leadership PAC funds could be legally used to support the
Senator’s campaign, this would mean that an individual could provide a total of $34,200 to support the Senator’s campaign – $30,000 to the
Leadership PAC and $4,200 to the campaign committee – or more than eight times the $4,200 maximum individual contribution allowed for a federal candidate’s campaign.

The rider attached to the Senate Transportation Appropriations bill
would license a major circumvention of the contribution limits by allowing a Senator’s Leadership PAC funds to be sent to the Senator’s party committee and then spent by the party committee on the Senator’s campaign. And since the rider defines a Leadership PAC as a PAC established by a federal officeholder, this scheme to circumvent the contribution limits would be available only to congressional incumbents.

If the Leadership PAC rider were enacted, we would end up with races
where the Senate incumbent had an individual contribution limit of
$34,200 for his re-election campaign, while the challenger had a limit of $4,200. – an enormous and discriminatory advantage for incumbents over their challengers. In effect, a congressional incumbent would be allowed to have two separate committees to finance his or her campaign, with separate contribution limits for each committee, while a challenger would have one committee with one set of contribution limits.

The same problem would exist regarding PAC contributions to federal
candidates. Under current law, a PAC can give $5,000 for a Senator’s
primary race and $5,000 for the general election race, or a total of $10,000 to support a Senator’s campaign. The same PAC can give $5,000 per year, or $30,000 over six years, to the Senator’s Leadership PAC. If an unlimited amount of a Senator’s Leadership PAC funds can be given to a party committee and then spent by the party committee on the Senator’s campaign, this means a PAC could provide a total of $40,000, instead of $10,000, to support a Senator’s campaign. The Senator’s challenger, meanwhile, would be limited to raising a total of $10,000 from a PAC for the challenger’s campaign.

http://capwiz.com/lwv/issues/alert/?alertid=8019476


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

This email sent by:

DemocracyWeek.org
http://democracyweek.org
1126 W. Edgemont Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona 85007
USA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. GO GRANNY D!
GO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. granny
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2090871&mesg_id=2090871

Please give this a kick, I don't understand the lack of response for Granny!???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. kick
I love Granny D, meeting her was a highlight of my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. KICK for Granny D!
She is the BEST!
Go to her websit GrannyD and learn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. these people are lower than low . . . I can't wait to find out . . .
what goodies are hidden in the Katrina relief bills . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. There aught to be a law (or two)
No bill will be passed without appropriate review by a standing committee (no committee as a whole).

No House/Senate conference committee compromises. Anything agreed to in conference committee goes back to BOTH chambers for ratification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. Morning kick for Granny D
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Done!
Thanks to bringing this to our attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. kicked and HIGHLY recommended! . . . please join me . . .
in bumping this thread to the "Greatest" list . . . this is EXTREMELY important information that EVERYONE should see! . . . thanx . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks for the kick
It's catching on, slowly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarahlee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks
Put the calls on my morning to do list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Very important! This subject needs another thread with a subject
line that tells that it's about legalizing corrupt campaign financing. Granny D is a national treasure, and bless her for pointing this out, but many people who don't know of her may pass this thread by and not learn of this contemptible move by the monumentally corrupt GOP.

I am also wondering very hard what has been happening with the horrible "Make Congress More Corrupt" bill, HR 1316:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1847357
Thread title: Email your Reps to STOP H.R. 1316, the "Make Congress More Corrupt" Bill

I wrote that post in June, and HR 1316 was already out of committee. It is truly heinous. I'm wondering if this rider that Granny D is pointing out is a way to sneak part of the HR 1316 campaign financing corruption measures through without stirring up a public outcry. A stealth crime. And meanthile, what IS happening with the whole enchilada, the dreadful HR 1316?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. what IS happening with the whole enchilada, the dreadful HR 1316?
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:HR01316:@@@X

H.R.1316
Title: To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to repeal the limit on the aggregate amount of campaign contributions that may be made by individuals during an election cycle, to repeal the limit on the amount of expenditures political parties may make on behalf of their candidates in general elections for Federal office, to allow State and local parties to make certain expenditures using nonfederal funds, to restore certain rights to exempt organizations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep Pence, Mike (introduced 3/15/2005) Cosponsors (38)
Latest Major Action: 6/22/2005 Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 87.
House Reports: 109-146
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALL ACTIONS: (color indicates Senate actions)
3/15/2005:
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
6/8/2005:
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
6/8/2005:
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 6 - 3.
4/12/2005:
Introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1857-1858)
4/27/2005:
Introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2556)
6/22/2005 6:07pm:
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on House Administration. H. Rept. 109-146.
6/22/2005 6:07pm:
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 87.
7/12/2005:
Introductory remarks on measure. (CR H5643)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frictionlessO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is incredibly important... more of our people need to read this.
Im sending this one out to my list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kick for Granny D!
The bestest of all, go to Granny D's website!
A marvelous WOMAN and real live Patriot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. And another
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. kick - just saw this
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC