Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The ONION points out John Roberts' utter inexperience in fine style:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 05:49 AM
Original message
The ONION points out John Roberts' utter inexperience in fine style:
Edited on Thu Sep-15-05 05:51 AM by Nothing Without Hope
Except for this recent DU post:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4777322
I have seen almost no one point out that

A MAN WITH ONLY TWO YEARS' EXPERIENCE AS A JUDGE AT ANY LEVEL IS NOT QUALIFIED TO BE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT!!!!!


Here's The Onion's way of pointing this out:

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/40512

Bush Nominates First-Trimester Fetus To Supreme Court


September 14, 2005 | Issue 41•37

WASHINGTON, DC—In a press conference Monday, President Bush named a 72-day-old gestating fetus as his nominee to fill the Supreme Court seat that opened following the death of Chief Justice William Rehnquist.

"Already, this experienced and capable embryo has demonstrated during his or her in utero existence a deep commitment to the core principles of the Constitution," Bush said. "It is with great pride that I nominate this unborn American patriot to the highest court in the land."

If confirmed by Congress, the bean-sized vertebrate would be the nation's first prenatal Supreme Court justice.

The unnamed fetus, who made headlines only three weeks ago when he or she was appointed to the Virginia State Supreme Court after working at a private law practice for five hours, has enjoyed a meteoric career in American jurisprudence. A remarkable prodigy who graduated from Georgetown Law School mere days after his or her neural folds fused, the nominee reportedly shares much of the conservative, pro-business philosophy of the Bush White House.

(snip - the rest is great too; they even "quote" Alan Dershowitz!)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you!
Nothing like a good LOL to start the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Onion gets it in my view. Bush has proof that the GOP can not run a govt.
So I am sure they will keep voting in the same type of men to keep trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. well....
chief justice earl warren was appointed to the SCOTUS without having served a single day as a judge anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Gotta love The Onion
I'll be laughing all day....:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. This issue also has a piece about Halliburton getting a contract to get
the gold out of dead peoples' teeth in the hurricane area. Again, macabre and right on target. Mondy over life every time. Of course, it can't really be true, because the poor people who died in such numbers couldn't afford gold in their teeth.

In fact, Cheney's office gave an order to shunt emergency power to oil pipelines instead of to the people who needed it, so the truth is almost as bad:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4768514
thread title: Cheney diverted power to pipe line for oil - IMPORTANT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. Makes Sense to Me, But
In actuality, you don't even have to be a lawyer to be a Supreme Court Judge. Figure that out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Talk about lack of experience and an unknown history!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Well, at least it avoids gender discrimination!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC