Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who exactly are the people who will vote on Roberts? How

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:22 PM
Original message
Who exactly are the people who will vote on Roberts? How
many of them are their? Does anyone have a list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
livefrom Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. It is a simple majority of the entire Senate, 51 votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. You mean the judicial committee? There are 10 Pubs and 8 Dems
I listened to tham all but I'll have to find the list of names. Hold on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livefrom Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. The judicial committee justs conducts the hearings.
The vote is that of the entire Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elsiesummers Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. I saw the strategy somewhere...don't know where... that
since the only way they can block a judicial nominee will be with a fillibuster, but they have this gang of 14 agreement, they are going to smile and confirm Roberts with a bipartisan majority since there is no way, even with every Democrat voting party line, they can stop Robets.

Then, when Bush sends up a nominee for Sandra Day O'Conner's Supreme Court Seat, if they don't like the nominee, they will fillibuster - and can point to the Roberts nomination to show as an example of how reasonable they can be with a qualified nominee.

They can't use the fillibuster yet because of the agreement, but after setting a standard of reasonablenees this time they can demonstrate the extrordinary circumstances of the next nominee.

Or, Bush could send forward someone who the Dems see as the best they are going to do, and then the pressure of the possibility of a fillibuster will have tempered the Bush selection.

I'm not sure of the outcome of this game of chicken, but since the Dems are so clearly in a minority, I don't see what they have to lose. They are virtually powerless in their current minority position.

Of course, if they can't come up with a filibuster proof 40 votes next time, then we will be screwed on both nominees and will all be taking a look the possible four or more turn coats, and whether they are earning their keep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MintOreoCookie Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I totally agree. Roberts will be confirmed.
The dems are saving the right of filibuster for the next nominee. That ought to be interesting.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Who is on the judicial committee? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC