Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WHINERS AT NEWSMAX BLAME THE MEDIA FOR KATRINA "PERCEPTIONS"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
powergirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:08 AM
Original message
WHINERS AT NEWSMAX BLAME THE MEDIA FOR KATRINA "PERCEPTIONS"
Taking another page out of the Iraq war playbook, Newsmax is complaining that the media "slanted" it's coverage about the hurricane in obvious bias to the prez. And of course, no newsmax article would be complete without invoking the name of Clinton!

Thursday, Sept. 15, 2005 11:28 p.m. EDT
House Homeland Chair Blasts Katrina Coverage

Bush Vows Aid for Storm-Struck Gulf Coast

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/9/15/234104.shtml


"Newly appointed House Homeland Security Committee chairman Peter King is blasting the media for slanting its coverage of the Hurricane Katrina disaster to turn public opinion against President Bush.

Asked why President Clinton wasn't blamed for natural disasters during the 1990s, King told WMET-Washington fill-in host Steve Malzberg: "The advantage the Clinton administration had was it didn't have so many TV reporters who were geared against the president that they would totally slant the news."

King said the Federal Emergency Management Agency's handling of the Katrina crisis hasn't been the unmitigated disaster reporters claim.
"The FEMA of ten years ago certainly did not do any better job under much less comparable circumstances than FEMA did this time," he told Malzberg, who was filling in for nationally syndicated radio host Linda Chavez.


"Of everyone involved, certainly they were the least culpable," the House Homeland chief said. "I think the main fault was the state and city of New Orleans - they did a terrible job."
The New York Republican added: "Our response plans are based on the premise that the local first responders will handle the initial onslaught. We were't expecting that the local government would do absolutely nothing."

:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. I just don't remember Clinton standing by while an American city drowned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. But...but... did the media create
photo ops of bloated dead bodies? Did the media fill the SuperDome to overflowing, denying the basic essential, water, to the masses, and do nothing? Sorry, doesn't wash, Newsmax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KellyW Donating Member (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. As Clinton use to say...
When the repugs were on the lame taking points-
"That dog won't hunt"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomPainesBones Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hilarious
"The advantage the Clinton administration had was it didn't have so many TV reporters who were geared against the president that they would totally slant the news."

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. yeah, it was slanted alright
:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. According to the Federal National Response Plan, the Feds are responsible.
Edited on Fri Sep-16-05 11:47 AM by Wordie
The plan says that the Secretary of Homeland Security assumes responsiblity when the state is overwhelmed and assistance has been requested (as everyone knows, there has been a huge debate about whether Blanco made such a request, or made it "properly"). But, that issue aside, it also says the HS Secretary will assume the responsibility when so directed by the President.

Therefore, it was either the PRESIDENT'S failure to direct the HS Secretary to assume responsibility, or the Secretary's failure to carry out those responsiblities that lead to the slow response.

So the Newsmax people are spinning away, when the President's OWN plan gave him the ulimate responsibility.

The National Response Plan is here (html version): http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:3BvdYFKO9vEJ:www.nemaweb.org/docs/national_response_plan.pdf+National+Response+Plan&hl=en

<snip (excerpt)>

V. Roles and Responsibilities
B. The Federal Government
1. The Secretary of Homeland Security
d. Incident Management
(3) Provides direction for the application of the Federal Government’s
resources utilized in response to or recovery from domestic incidents if and when any of the following conditions or thresholds apply:

a. A Federal department or agency acting under its own authority
requests the Secretary’s assistance;

b. The resources of State and local authorities have been overwhelmed
and Federal assistance has been requested;

c. More than one Federal department or agency has become substantially
involved in responding to an incident; or

d. The President directs the Secretary to assume responsibility for
managing the domestic incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC