Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Clark finishes 3rd will he remain a top-tier candidate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:40 PM
Original message
If Clark finishes 3rd will he remain a top-tier candidate?
If he finishes 3rd will he get a small bounce into 2/3 since the top 2 were in their backyard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. If he does, he is a top tier candidate.
If Edwards finishes fourth, he's in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichV Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. A shame how that works
given they'll likely be just a handful of votes apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. 700 and counting right now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathleen04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Edwards is still in good shape at 4th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I disagree
Edwards did better than expected if he finishes 4th right on the heels of 3rd place Clark. He will make his move next week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. He's not going to be in trouble for being 1% point away from Clark
in a state in which Clark lost almost half his support in a week and Edwards more than doubled his, and in a state where, if you had taken dean and Kerry out, it's not clear that Clark would have won over Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Not to worry
JRE will be Clark's VP ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. hardly, its all he ever aspired for there
he scarcely campaigned and still got attention. Clark campaigned there heavily and expensively and was sliding downhill hard the last week or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kovasb Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Edwards spent more total time in NH than clark
Clark was there a lot the last 3-4 weeks, but edwards has been running for well over a year, and has been to NH often. I think i did over 100 town halls in total. And yet he showed 0 movement until after iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. which is pretty normal
but as you say, Clark has been there a lot since he threw his hat in and he saw his fortunes wilt after Iowa.

And Clark's overall numbers have been flat as well.

All that meant little till real people starting casting real votes.

Traction begins in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turkw Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. That's right, just keep repeating what the pundits say- fourth good third
bad. Clark may do very well, Edwards may do very well, Dean may do very well, a LOT more votes need to be cast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #24
43. And then bounce back to take third.
The only ones who beat him were in their own back yard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dobak Donating Member (808 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. 3rd will be just fine
Dean was expected to beat him

Kerry has the momentum coming in

----

If Clark finishes 3rd, he and Kerry are the winners tonight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. We have four top tier candidates, Edwards included.
Third place is a tie, regardless of the numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funkyflathead Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. No
It's a three man race- Edwards, Kerry and Dean.

Clark is still out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Care to explain that?
Third was right where clark was aiming for in this primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funkyflathead Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
33. Then Clark is an idiot
He should have been aiming for 1st place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. The you need to tell the voters that.
They are not listening to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes
This is, after all, his first primary. Kerry is widing masssive momentum, and Dean has been in the top spot for a while, so third isn't really that bad in New Hampshire for Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. He and Edwards are top tier candidates until Feb 3rd
At that point, those two (and Dean) have to have some actual victories in their pockets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not systems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yep... Kerry, Dean, Edwards and Clark. n/t
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 09:44 PM by ezmojason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. You almost have the candidates in the right order.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not systems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Dean, Clark and Kerry is my personal ordering.
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 09:51 PM by ezmojason
Go Dean!

Go Clark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SadEagle Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Who knows?
It's all a perceptions thing; like everything about "momentum". Personally, I don't see much difference between 3rd and 4th, when it's that close; but I also base my vote on what I think of the candidates, and not on what people in other states vote like, so who am I to understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. I believe no matter who finishes 3rd & 4th...
They will both still be top tier. SC will make the difference for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think it's still a four man race
We haven't even gotten to the South where I think Clark and Edwards will do well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguewolf5 Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Even if Edwards got 3rd straight out
He's got claim to beating Joe who like CLark has been in NH exclusivily. But a tie with Clark just solidifies a Clark/Dean/Edwards/Kerry race for the next month.

and thats what we got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Even if Edwards is third
Clark's day has still not arrived yet and he'll be in the mix and I'm a Dean supporter but I think Clark has a lot of internal support among the "Clinton" Democracts. Yes, Clark has yet to catch fire with the general public but I think he still can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:45 PM
Original message
Yes, Clark will do very well in the South.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. It gets him a 1st class ticket to Feb. 3d.
That day, Kerry could run the board and become the nominee-in-waiting, Clark could tank, or Clark could (1) win a state or two, and (2) land in the top two in at least four states. If he does the latter, he faces a Clark-Edwards elimination match in VA and TN. If he does well there, and Kerry can't lock it up, it's on to March Madness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. Considering He Was Declared DOA by Fox, CNN, MSNBC, et al
I'd say it would be darn near Lazarus-like if he came in third. I wonder how they'll spin it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Exactly
love the Lazarus reference.

The media either ignored Clark or tried convince people that he was a loser. Nice of the media to make up our minds for us? Glad to see its not working.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. not like that
if it were a contending third it would be one thing but it was a backsliding third and narrowly over my guy who hardly campaigned there.

Anything short of 20% was a bad night for the General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguewolf5 Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. that could be a way for the networks to spin it
good call =\
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. its the basic facts, no spin
look at Clark's numbers in this 3 day tracking poll. Where did his votes go ?.

11-Jan 19
12-Jan 20
13-Jan 22
14-Jan 24
15-Jan 23
16-Jan 22
17-Jan 20
18-Jan 20
19-Jan 19
20-Jan 18
21-Jan 19
22-Jan 20
23-Jan 19
24-Jan 17
25-Jan 15
26-Jan 13

(RPG poll compilation the others show a similar trend)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JasonBerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
30. NO - Bad News for Clark
Edwards this close to Clark is not good for Wesley Clark. He passed Iowa by and focused on New Hampshire after his announcement. How could he be satisfied with 3rd or 4th? To barely be in double digits is a horrible showing for a candidate whose resume made it appear he could be a strong candidate. Add to this, his falling poll ratings nationally. I noticed a HUGE difference between Clark and Edwards tonight in their speeches. Edwards looked pumped - Clark appeared tired and ready to go home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. How do you figure it is bad?
When did Clark enter the race? When did Edwards enter the race? Clark for never running in an election and only entering the race a couple of months ago. This is great For Wesley Clark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
31. Clark is only 20,000
votes behind Dean and in the grand scheme of things, that is didly squat.

MzPip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
36. There is only one top-tier candidate right now -- Kerry
Dean, Clark and Edwards are all second tier. The rest are also rans. And if Dean, Clark and Edwards fail to win any states next Tuesday, they'll be out too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I can only say if, thats what you believe go with it!
Dreams are great to have aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shivaji Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
38. Clark was CAMPED out in NH while the rest of leading
candidates were busy campaigning in Iowa. If Clark finishes a
distant third almost tied for 4th & 5th place, his stock has
taken a beating.

Let's tally the results so far:

Iowa: 0 delegates for Clark (Kerry, Edwards , Dean get them all)
NH: 0 delegates for Clark (Kerry & Dean take them all)
SC: Edwards a sure win, Dean or Kerry will get 2nd.

Clark is doing wonderful so far (sarcasm).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Edwards is not a sure winner in SC.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turkw Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. So why can't career politician Edwards beat Clark? Clark has been in the
race for less than half a year, Edwards has been in over a year and a half? The only real looser is Lieberman, 5th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DjTj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. LOL
...career politician Edwards...

I suppose Edwards' one previous election makes him a career politican.

They are both relative newcomers that have improved dramatically in the past few months. They will both serve the Democratic party well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turkw Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. Hey, I just used the other side of the coin, and Edwards didn't do bad,
but the idea the Fourth is good and Third is bad is the worst kind of spin that the media is spewing tonight. Lieberman should have cleaned Clark and Edwards' clocks and given Kerry and Dean a little run for their money. That Clark and Edwards have double digits is good for them both.

This is Edwards second run for office at least so he is not an outsider, but hey, I didn't call Edwards a "lawyer" :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #38
53. not only is Edwards not a sure winner in SC
Dean and Kerry aren't getting #2. all the polls show Clark in at least the top 2.

If Edwards doesn't win SC he's out, and if Dean doesn't win any states he's out. The only state Dean has a shot at is Delaware. After next Tuesday unless Dean gets Delaware and/or Edwards get SC, it's down to Kerry vs. Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
overground1 Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
40. No. - Because he skipped Iowa to focus on NH, he had to win today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
overground1 Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. CORRECTION: Clark was NEVER a top tier candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turkw Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. Actually he needed to place in the top three, which is what he has done
He did better than THREE career politicians who have been campaigning for over a year longer than he has. Edwards did not do bad, but he didn't do better than Clark and Edwards spend more time total in NH than Clark did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
49. Let's see: Dean and Kerry are from neighboring states. If they
didn't place 1 or 2 then they would be in trouble. Now we get to see how the candidates do in the South and West. Different demographics than in the Northeast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DjTj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
46. The test for Edwards and Clark is South Carolina.
...whether they are top tier or not will be decided on February 3.

Iowa and NH tell us that they are NOT also-rans, but whether they are top tier is yet to be determined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
47. Hell Yeah.
Clark is everyone's worst nightmare. Once his message starts getting more widespread and he gets more focus as a serious contender more people will come into the fold. This guy is for real and he can win it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
51. Why can't he be secretary of defense instead?
More suited to his background, what with never having held elected office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
52. nope...both Dean and Clark are now 2nd tier.
Lieberman and Edwards are now third tier. Edwards only hope to move back up to the second tier would be to win South Carolina, but even that may be too little too late!

As Kerry says..."Bring it on!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 20th 2025, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC