Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats Face Pressures on Roberts Issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 12:32 AM
Original message
Democrats Face Pressures on Roberts Issue
snip

One Democrat who is close to the Judiciary Committee said the issue broke down this way: If the nominee to replace O'Connor is going to be more conservative than Roberts, and more controversial, would it be better to have seven or eight Democratic votes in favor of Roberts or to have 30 or 35?

A second Democrat said part of the calculation reflected the view of some senators that Bush may shrink from confrontation when he fills the second vacancy, at a time when public support for the war in
Iraq is dwindling and his overall public approval is at the lowest point of his presidency.

Yet a third said some Democratic senators argue that they will be in a better political position to oppose a second, more conservative nominee if they have voted for Roberts.

snip
One Democratic strategist with long experience in senatorial campaigns dismissed such claims.

"Never once have Democrats benefited from attempts at reasonableness and compromise and accommodation," said Jim Jordan, former executive director of the party's senatorial committee. "To the contrary, Bush and his team seem to view political compromise as weakness, and they punish it rather than reward or reciprocate it."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050920/ap_on_go_su_co/roberts;_ylt=AvNm6Th5N4cUBWRQO7vMYP.yFz4D;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Never once have Democrats benefited from attempts at ... compromise"
True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hear that, DLCers? Appeasement doesn't work.
Many of us knew that already. It didn't work in Munich. It won't work in Washington, DC, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladylibertee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. They should just err on the side of our party and vote NO on
both. I mean, it's not like they have a chance at not getting Roberts or the next poliical " priest" confirmed anyway.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. shrink
"A second Democrat said part of the calculation reflected the view of some senators that Bush may shrink from confrontation when he fills the second vacancy, at a time when public support for the war in
Iraq is dwindling and his overall public approval is at the lowest point of his presidency. " Shrink from controversy? Bush? That'll be the day!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Porcupine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. They will roll over and play dead.
The DLC has screwed the rank and file time and again since 2001 and the selection. Why would we expect anything different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Good GOD ALMIGHTY! APPOSE THEM ALL, YOU CRETINS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC