Judge bars release of Ghraib photo's again

[babsbunny]

even the one's already made public. www.rawstory.com

[endarkenment]

1. This is not the ACLU lawsuit case.

This is the unfortunate Ms. England's case, where she gets to go to jail for the Rumsfeld/Gonzales/Bush torture them all policy.

[indepat]

2. FOIA done been revoked?

[tom_paine]

3. Revoked in the Bushevik way...revoked in all but the hollow shell

In other words, they don't come out and SAY "we're revoking FOIA" or "the Bill of Rights is hereby revoked", but the reality is that these items, and so many others which still remain as hollow meaningless shells, are gone.

Imperial Amerika is ruled by Imperial Will and THE PARTY. All else is meaningless and hollowed out.

For the rubes, you know. They (we) are so married to the idea of being "free".

:rofl:

[indepat]

5. The handwriting has long been on the wall for all to see but constant lies

keep it glossed over.

[Chipper Chat]

4. What is a photo's again?

Wasn't aware a photo could own anything.

[jilln]

6. It's friends with the "one's" in the body of the message...

and the "channel's" my coworker watches, and the "thank's" I got in a job application for a proofreader...

[Chipper Chat]

7. Ha ha ha - great reply.

Naturally, I don't mean to belittle the orig poster, but I finally got up the nerve to be a smartass and comment on the unneccessary 's peeps in here use. Surely we wouldn't want to be hypocrits and smite freepers for bad puctuation when there are splinters ('s) in our own eyes.
Game over.