Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why the Democratic Party Needs its own "Contract with America"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 03:10 PM
Original message
Why the Democratic Party Needs its own "Contract with America"
Edited on Tue Sep-20-05 03:13 PM by Totally Committed
The Contract With America was a book-length statement of Republican ideas, the brainchild of Newt Gingrich, and endorsed by scores of Republican candidates who, in the election of the following November, won elections to Congress.

Just calling it a "contract" proved to be a stroke of brilliance. President Clinton, their "enemy", was made to appear to the public as untrustworthy, unfaithful, a breaker of compacts and promises, just with the use of that one word.

This "contract" began the Republican Neo-Con (Neo Conservative) Revolution that has continued and grown since that day in 1994, when Newt and his Neo-Cons, gathered together on the steps of the Capitol, and began their assault. The result is: Republicans (most are Neo-Cons), control the three arms of our government, and are as we speak installing two Supreme Court Justices, making this court, by far, the most Conservative and Draconian Supreme Court in history. The Contract was a stunning victory, and one that has given the RNC absolute supremacy.

I believe the Democratic Party needs to have it's own "Contract with America." The whole Party... every current Democratic member of the House and the Senate (no exceptions), and all the new Democratic candidates for House and Senate seats in the 2006 elections should gather together on the steps of the Capitol, in a show of unity, as the author(s) of the document reads it for the cameras. Following the reading, several speakers (chosen ahead of time for their forcefullness and leadership) would make prepared statements. The Democratic Candidates would be introduced. And there would be a formal Group Portrait taken.

The text of the document should be a strong, honest, heart-felt, and unambiguous statement of what the Democratic Party is prepared to do for and with the American People, as their partners, when they govern once again.
The entire contract is book-length. Here is the statement read by Gingrich on the steps of the Capital September 29, 1994. Think of how much better, and how much more beneficial to all the people the Democrats could make theirs in comparison!

REPUBLICAN CONTRACT WITH AMERICA

As Republican Members of the House of Representatives and as citizens seeking to join that body we propose not just to change its policies, but even more important, to restore the bonds of trust between the people and their elected representatives.


That is why, in this era of official evasion and posturing, we offer instead a detailed agenda for national renewal, a written commitment with no fine print.

This year's election offers the chance, after four decades of one-party control, to bring to the House a new majority that will transform the way Congress works. That historic change would be the end of government that is too big, too intrusive, and too easy with the public's money. It can be the beginning of a Congress that respects the values and shares the faith of the American family.

Like Lincoln, our first Republican president, we intend to act "with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right." To restore accountability to Congress. To end its cycle of scandal and disgrace. To make us all proud again of the way free people govern themselves.

On the first day of the 104th Congress, the new Republican majority will immediately pass the following major reforms, aimed at restoring the faith and trust of the American people in their government:

FIRST, require all laws that apply to the rest of the country also apply equally to the Congress;

SECOND, select a major, independent auditing firm to conduct a comprehensive audit of Congress for waste, fraud or abuse;

THIRD, cut the number of House committees, and cut committee staff by one-third;

FOURTH, limit the terms of all committee chairs;

FIFTH, ban the casting of proxy votes in committee;

SIXTH, require committee meetings to be open to the public;

SEVENTH, require a three-fifths majority vote to pass a tax increase;

EIGHTH, guarantee an honest accounting of our Federal Budget by implementing zero base-line budgeting.

Thereafter, within the first 100 days of the 104th Congress, we shall bring to the House Floor the following bills, each to be given full and open debate, each to be given a clear and fair vote and each to be immediately available this day for public inspection and scrutiny.

1. THE FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT: A balanced budget/tax limitation amendment and a legislative line-item veto to restore fiscal responsibility to an out- of-control Congress, requiring them to live under the same budget constraints as families and businesses.

2. THE TAKING BACK OUR STREETS ACT: An anti-crime package including stronger truth-in- sentencing, "good faith" exclusionary rule exemptions, effective death penalty provisions, and cuts in social spending from this summer's "crime" bill to fund prison construction and additional law enforcement to keep people secure in their neighborhoods and kids safe in their schools.

3. THE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT: Discourage illegitimacy and teen pregnancy by prohibiting welfare to minor mothers and denying increased AFDC for additional children while on welfare, cut spending for welfare programs, and enact a tough two-years-and-out provision with work requirements to promote individual responsibility.

4. THE FAMILY REINFORCEMENT ACT: Child support enforcement, tax incentives for adoption, strengthening rights of parents in their children's education, stronger child pornography laws, and an elderly dependent care tax credit to reinforce the central role of families in American society.

5. THE AMERICAN DREAM RESTORATION ACT: A S500 per child tax credit, begin repeal of the marriage tax penalty, and creation of American Dream Savings Accounts to provide middle class tax relief.

6. THE NATIONAL SECURITY RESTORATION ACT: No U.S. troops under U.N. command and restoration of the essential parts of our national security funding to strengthen our national defense and maintain our credibility around the world.

7. THE SENIOR CITIZENS FAIRNESS ACT: Raise the Social Security earnings limit which currently forces seniors out of the work force, repeal the 1993 tax hikes on Social Security benefits and provide tax incentives for private long-term care insurance to let Older Americans keep more of what they have earned over the years.

8. THE JOB CREATION AND WAGE ENHANCEMENT ACT: Small business incentives, capital gains cut and indexation, neutral cost recovery, risk assessment/cost-benefit analysis, strengthening the Regulatory Flexibility Act and unfunded mandate reform to create jobs and raise worker wages.

9. THE COMMON SENSE LEGAL REFORM ACT: "Loser pays" laws, reasonable limits on punitive damages and reform of product liability laws to stem the endless tide of litigation.

10. THE CITIZEN LEGISLATURE ACT: A first-ever vote on term limits to replace career politicians with citizen legislators.
Further, we will instruct the House Budget Committee to report to the floor and we will work to enact additional budget savings, beyond the budget cuts specifically included in the legislation described above, to ensure that the Federal budget deficit will be less than it would have been without the enactment of these bills.
Respecting the judgment of our fellow citizens as we seek their mandate for reform, we hereby pledge our names to this Contract with America.

http://www.house.gov/house/Contract/CONTRACT.html


What do you all think of this idea? I think it could work!

Please discuss.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow...did they do any of that?
Not a lot, that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They got four or five done...
And I agree with the original premise. A candidate I worked for in Ohio (2002 -- lost) had a "Bill of Rights for Working Americans" that included a Living Wage, Pension Security, Universal Healthcare, and increased funding for public education.

But because his opponent was a right-wing nutcase incumbent, he never got a hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Did either of you read the book?
What do you think aboutthe idea applied to the Democrats for the 2006 elections?

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. See my post below. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Are you talking about the "Contract" itself?
Calling it book-length is perhaps giving it too much credit. The Republicans may have developed some annotations to it, but the basic contract was small enough to be printed on an index card -- which Gingrich often pulled out of his pocket for a dramatic flourish back in 1994.

That's not to say that Democrats couldn't put together, say, a 100-page booklet that provides supporting documentation and talking points for party activists. The more intellectual ammunition we get, the better.

But let's not forget those values voters. My take is that people respond on the gut level to what's right and what's fair -- and showing them a pie-chart won't win their vote. We need to take the issues where we're strong and frame them in the language of values (personal and community).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Okay, "booklet"-length...
I guess you haven't see the BOOK (NYT Bestseller) "On Bullshit". It's longer than that, if I remember correctly. But, We can call it "booklet"-length if you want. :)

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. that was never the point.
The Contract was a political document, not one of good governance. And it worked.

Yes, we need one, but we can even make it about good, realizable (?) governance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. So let's start...
The new Democratic majority will:

1. Enact a balanced budget amendment.

2. Establish government contracting guidelines to close favored corporation loopholes.

3. Raise the minimum wage in accordance with the poverty line.

4. Enact healthcare reform that ensures that all Americans have access to affordable health care.

5. Re-write the Bush tax cuts to be fair to a broader economic spectrum of the population.

6. Expand tax credits for environmentally sustainable practices.

7. Close offshore tax loopholes for fleeing American corporations.

8. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AbbyR Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Something about voting rights, and verification...? (nft)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Maybe... We will guarantee your vote will count.
We will push to make paper ballots, and hand-counting universal.... something like that, maybe? Is that what you meant?

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why don't we ever call them on #8?
After all, when was the last time we had a minimum wage increase?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. We already have one. It's called The US Constitution.
Also "truth-in-sentencing" should be accompanied by truth in legislating. You cannot go before Congress with wildly fraudulent claims of Marijuana use compelling axe murders. Wildly fraudulent claims of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. We have got to stop this off the top of my head and flying by the seat of my pants legislating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Actually, the Constitution is not a "Contract" by the Democrats
with the voters of America. We need to absolutely state what we, as a Party, stand for, and promise to accomplish if we are voted back into power again.

This would save us from the different messages being presented every time one Democrat or another opens his or her mouth... it would be a unified message. And, since it would be something all Democrats would agree to, factions within the party would have less and less influence over policy.

And, the people could trust us again! One of the biggest reasons most who might vote for us, and then don't, is because we all say different things, say we stand for different things, and it confuses and scares them. They know that if they vote Republican there will be no surprises... they all say the same thing.

That's why I think it would be a good idea.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. How about
Healthcare is a Human Right
A "Democracy Day" holiday for elections.
Profit caps for all companies that deal in human necessities, like water, energy, healthcare, defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Wow...
Those are 3 really excellent points. And, they would be easy to "expand" upon.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Profit caps for necessities like food? It'll never fly.
MAYBE profit caps for gov contracts could be realized, but not for all human necessities.

We certainly need to cap and closely monitor gov contracts, (think Haliburton).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. New Bill of Rights (added to those we have)
1. The Right to Healthcare

2. The Right to Education (at all levels. Free college to those who meet certain academic standards - and not all that high)

3. The Right to Affordable Housing (median house cost is equal to median wage or homeowner gets federal rebate/credit)

4. The Right to Retirement( all are guaranteed 50% of the median national wage at time of retirement -means testing involved. If people have 4x or above the median wage income in retirement they draw nothing but get an inheritance of unused benefits available to heirs or charity of their choice)

5. The Right to Public Transport (in population centers above a stated level)

6. The Right to Utilities (light, water, heat, tv, radio and phone)Rigid price controls in place, possible nationalization for access to the basics of modern life. Enron proved that the free market with utilities does not work - private companies are not worthy of our trust ands will game the system if they can

7. The Right to Religious Freedom (practice or non-practice)

8. The Right To Universal Laws and Privileges regardless of gender or sexual preference

This country has more than adequate resources to pay for all of the above, whether through subsidies, Great Society Programs or whatever. For those people who are against so-called "entitlement" programs - right now the majority of the country- Joe and Mary Shit_ fund entitlement and welfare programs for the wealthiest, the corporations and the politically connected. We don't need to raise taxes one cent, we just need to re-direct the tax dollars that we take in currently.

Let's also get rid of property taxes and put a use or value tax on everything else (goods AND services). Give refunds to people under the poverty level so we won't hear those screams about it being "regressive". We could have the greatest society the world has ever known if we chose to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. But it's so ... nineties ... been done, sequels never do as well. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. Prepare for a revisionist regurgitation of these during the 08 race
from Newt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. And Dems should have a better one!
They are always accusing Dems of not having any solutions or ideas. Why NOT lay out our platform in clear terms? It certainly couldn't hurt to project our message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagiana Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. Item 1 )

The Democratic party promises to investigate the Bush administration for any crimes they have committed in relation to Iraq, energy policy and Hurricane Katrina disaster relief. Should it be necessary we shall request the president resign and impeach if necessary puruant to the best interest of the United States of America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raiden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. I remember reading a DUer's version - The Progressive Promise
I think I may have saved the text someplace. It was brilliant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC