Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

who would be VP if Cheney were to no longer be in the post

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 11:58 AM
Original message
who would be VP if Cheney were to no longer be in the post
due to resignation, or poor health or indictment...

Seriously - who would Rove choose that would be a successor - but wouldn't "outshine" junior?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madame defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Speaker of House, I think...
Dennis the Menace Hasturd.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. the two (so far) stating Hastert... fits
wouldn't upstage shrub - and would put DeLay in position to lead the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Yeah, I wondered that, too. Cheney is in surgery for an aneurysm today.
Too bad it's in his knee and not his brain. Not life threatening, is what the radio reporter said.

Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

One entry found for aneurysm.

Main Entry: an·eu·rysm
Variant(s): also an·eu·rism /'an-y&-"ri-z&m/
Function: noun
Etymology: Greek aneurysma, from aneurynein to dilate, from ana- + eurynein to stretch, from eurys wide -- more at EURY-
: an abnormal blood-filled dilatation of a blood vessel and especially an artery resulting from disease of the vessel wall
- an·eu·rys·mal /"an-y&-'riz-m&l/ adjective



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
57. Nope, not Hastert
Speaker of the House is next in the line of succession, if both Bush and Cheney die at the same time.

But if Cheney dies, or has to quit for ill health, then Bush appoints a new VP. I don't think it requires Senate confirmation (someone correct me if I'm wrong). It'll be whomever his handlers want to be the '08 nominee.

That leaves out McCain or Giuliani, imo. Maybe Frist, Allen or Santorum? Maybe someone who isn't on the 2008 radar yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gerald Ford, by tradition ... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. how about McCain
he's been supporting them 1000% lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. He would outshine smirk. Rove would never let that happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
47. There's always the bugman and the catkiller
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrumpyGreg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Speaker of the House!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. two-fer
doesn't outshine junior - and places DeLay clearly as Speaker of the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Powell
It's the safest choice. Congress would never impeach Bush and get a black president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. but Rove is trying to build a one-party state
how would they prevent Powell from then running on his own? Plus Powell would upstage junior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, probably whichever capo is next in line
Maybe James Baker, or even Jeb.

I know one thing -- it would be somebody already close. They don't let 'outsiders' in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Maybe Rove himelf? Then he has "experience" to run as pres?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyndCulture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. It would be Has'dirt' - the speaker is next in line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Not Exactly
The order of succession only applies if both the president and vice president are unable to perform their duties.

If the VP resigns, the President appoints a new one.
If the President is removed from office (or dies) the VP becomes President and then appoints a new VP

The reason Ford (Speaker of the House) became VP and Pres after Nixon resigned is because VP Spiro Agnew resigned and Nixon just happened to pick Ford as his successor. Nixon didn't have to, he just happened to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Z_I_Peevey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
41. Yes, there was quite a bit of time
when the country did not have a vice president at all. Speaker of the House Carl Albert was 'a heartbeat away' from the presidency, but he was still Speaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. Yes that's right
Until the 25th Amendment was passed in 1967 there was no Constitutional way to replace a Vice-president, so there were quite a few times where the country went years without one.

For instance, when Lincoln was killed, Andrew Johnson served as president for four years, part of the time on trial for impeachment, and the country had no VP.

Same when JFK was killed. LBJ moved up and there was no VP until 1965.

What if Cheney resigned for poor health?

Hmmm ...

Bush would choose Elizabeth Dole or Kay Bailey Hutchison. That's my guesses anyway. Or John McCain, or Colin Powell.

Just guesses of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. JEB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. 25th Amendment
gives the President the right to suggest a successor, but it needs confirmation by Congress. Before the enactment of the amendment, the Speaker of the House was the next in line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. and Tom DeLay poised to take over the House
not that he isn't already running it by Proxy, or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Confirmation by Senate or both houses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Probably the CEO of Halliburton...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyndCulture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. HA! good point,.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. He wouldn't take it. He'd lose access to the White House that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. Poppy. Though my dream choice would be Al Gore
So that when they impeach Bush, we'd finally get the elected president we deserve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Poppy is now too close to Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:09 PM
Original message
But Baby Bush wants to make Daddy dance like a marionette! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. probably more than a little bitter blood there right now
but I could NEVER see competitive poppy playing number two to sonny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. It's simple. Bush baby says "It's either you, dad, or Al Gore!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. bwahaha
junior threatens poppy with "Ozone Man" (poppy's term)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Well, he could make it Hillary instead. I don't think Poppy likes the baby
too much. I think Bill is the son Poppy wishes he'd had. So it might take Little Dub a bit of threatening to get Poppy on his side. Then again, Poppy might do it because he knows how to run a presidency from the back seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. throw em all for a loop... Chelsea! but she is too young.
Edited on Sat Sep-24-05 12:49 PM by salin
threaten that he will start a Clinton dynasty to replace the house of bush. That would get poppy in line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
23. Bob Taft ?
he has that pay for play thing down pat. And his numbers are lower than bush so he wouldn't upstage the boyking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
27. Alberto Gonzales...
I pick him ahead of Condi because of the 'outshine' factor. As the first minority and female presidential VP, she'd take too much away from Prez...

Gonzales on the other hand, close personal friend, insider, minority, VERY good at avoiding the limelight.

Powell would be the kiss of death for Jr. Literally - how many 'groups' (military, CIA...) are fed up with * and would embrace Powell.... Think about it.

Baker - he could have had it had he wanted it before Cheney got it. In fact, I often wonder how much of what Rove boy is accused of he actually does, and how much of it originates with J. Baker....

Rove's not a kingmaker - no matter how much he wants to be, he's a kingmaker's gopher.

Jim Baker is a kingmaker. Not a VP. He'd never lower himself that far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Gonzales or Hastert
make sense to me. I would suggest Perry - but couldn't play the "we really aren't from the same state" game that Cheney played.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. My take on Hastert is that he isn't as much an
insider as Bush would want...Not now.

Perry - not a chance. He's too slick. Standing side by side, Bush looks unkempt - can't have anyone who will intentionally upstage the Prez.

Do side by side comparisons:

Hastert - too tall, makes * look short
Perry (aka Gov. Goodhair)....Don't even think about it.

Gonzales: Shorter than *. Cleancut, not ostentatious (like Perry), 'less' physically fit than *....

When looking for a replacement, how they will make * look standing side by side with him will be a critical factor - competency, not so much....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. but insider loyalty as imp as the side by side look factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #29
49. Not Hastert
a Speaker of the House is more important than a VP. Why would Bush pick him anyway? No charisma, no base of support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. Just to be clear .......
Presidential succession laws have no impact on the circumstance where the president stays and the VP leaves.

If the president stays, then he gets to select a VP.

It happened fairly recently. Agnew left and Ford was appointed by Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shadder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Which was quiclky followed by
Ford appointing Rocky VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. is there no confirmation process? Simple appointment only?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawwolf Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Both houses would have to approve a new VP.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. thank you.
Edited on Sat Sep-24-05 01:03 PM by salin
no problem per whatever the pres wants to do in the House - but perhaps forces a slight moderation per the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
35. The chain of succession does not apply for the VP...
Bush/Rove would get to appoint a new VP just in time to give that person incumbency for the 2008 elections, if they work it right. :sarcasm:

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. but they only have one year to give that person a chance
to not count the first term (and be able to be elected two times - and serve 10 years.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvliberal Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
42. God forbid Cheney should die.
Bush would actually have to be president.

If Cheney did, Condi would get the VP slot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. I can't see that happening. The "successor"
would have to be someone who would takeover (Rove's view of 50 years of one-party rule) - and I just can't see a big chunk of "the base" voting for an African American or for a woman let alone and African American woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvliberal Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Oh, I don't think it matters in the case of Condi.
Edited on Sat Sep-24-05 02:01 PM by nvliberal
If she can win it for the Republicans (legitimately or through fraud), the "base" will overlook her "shortcomings."

She's the exception to the usual rule about females and minorities versus the Republican "base."

It's the neocons, after all, who run things, and Condi is their puppet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. but they still have to hold elections - and to steal
have to be marginally close (or TOO obvious to TOO many people) - do you really think she could come "marginally close" in many of the deep south states or a place like my homestate - Indiana? She might make it too hard to "steal" let alone win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawwolf Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. I think she has a good chance
I am also from Indiana and have a lot of republican friends. None of them think Dick is running in 08 and most of them think Condi would be a good choice. They would love to be able to say the first African American and the first woman President were Republican. If they can get an African American Woman, then they only have to do it once (or twice) and then go back to voting for old white men and can say "Hey, we aren't racist or sexist, we voted for a black woman once."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
43. No matter who replaced Cheney...
it would probably be like replacing Hitler with Stalin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
51. The "heir apparent"
wouldn't the shrub attempt to pick his successor?

George Allen?
Newt?
One of his Governor buddies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemDogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
52. Not an idle question
People who get this kind of surgery do not have very good prognosis --- two years maybe?

25th Amendment: Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

Whomever he picked would likely be confirmed unless we have some 2006 magic. Don't know if this could be filibustered, but there wouldn't be a "President of the Senate" to rule that the filibuster was unavailable.

I think he would use it for a legacy chip -- especially if the tanking continues -- so expect a Gonzales or Rice. Never a Powell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
53. The President appoints a new Vice President
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 12:36 AM by ProudDad
As Nixon did with Ford after Agnew was indicted and resigned...

As for succession, if both the Pres and Veep buy the farm, According to the wikipedia -- (Think Richard the III with Norm Minetta in the title role :)

The Presidential line of succession, as specified by the United States Constitution and under United States Code Title 3, Section 19 (a.k.a. the Presidential Succession Act of 1947) is currently:

1. Vice President (Richard B. Cheney)
2. Speaker of the House of Representatives (J. Dennis Hastert)
3. President pro tempore of the Senate (Ted Stevens)
4. Secretary of State (Condoleezza Rice)
5. Secretary of the Treasury (John W. Snow)
6. Secretary of Defense (Donald H. Rumsfeld)
7. Attorney General (Alberto Gonzales)
8. Secretary of the Interior (Gale Norton)
9. Secretary of Agriculture (Mike Johanns)
10. Secretary of Commerce (Carlos Gutierrez, ineligible)
11. Secretary of Labor (Elaine Chao, ineligible)
12. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Michael Leavitt)
13. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (Alphonso Jackson)
14. Secretary of Transportation (Norman Y. Mineta)
15. Secretary of Energy (Samuel W. Bodman)
16. Secretary of Education (Margaret Spellings)
17. Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Jim Nicholson)

Notes on the current line of succession

Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez and Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao are ineligible to assume the Presidency, as they are not natural born citizens.

As of early 2005, the Secretary of Homeland Security has not been put into the line of succession. Senate Bill 442, approved by the Senate on July 27, 2005, would, if it were to become law, place the Secretary of Homeland Security after the Attorney General and before the Secretary of the Interior in the line of succession. That bill and a companion bill, H.R. 1455, are currently pending before the House of Representatives' Judiciary Committee.

Since Article Two establishes only eligibility requirements for the "office of President", and since these officials, according to the Constitution, "act as President", it had been a subject of controversy whether they would be constitutionally eligible (the same Constitutional question also exists for the residency and age requirements). To avoid a needless Constitutional dispute at what would likely be a time of great crisis, the statute (3 USC 19(e)) specifies that even the acting President must meet the Constitutional requirements for the office of President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
54. Rove stopped worrying about outshining * right after the mock election.
While everyone else was planning for the second coronation, Rove was planning for '08. Rove is more about promoting his version of permanent Republican majority through winning in '08 than he is interested in Bush's "legacy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
55. Beats me, but it wouldn't be a...
Ford who was selected simply because he was a nice guy untouched by scandal.

They learned back then that they needed someone who could stand on his own and get re-elected and not get whupped by the likes of a Jimmy Carter. Somebody's sitting in the wings waiting, and we'll know for sure next year if they think they're going to lose the House.

My scenario-- Cheney quits next year because of health problems and the white knight takes over. Said white knight is ready to step in if Shrub gets impeached, and whether Shrub gets impeached or not, is set up to run in '08.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladylibertee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
56. The only one worthy to replace Cheney? SATAN there,I said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
58. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC