Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Army plans to bulk-buy anthrax (and they won't say why)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 10:02 PM
Original message
US Army plans to bulk-buy anthrax (and they won't say why)
The US military wants to buy large quantities of anthrax, in a controversial move that is likely to raise questions over its commitment to treaties designed to limit the spread of biological weapons.

A series of contracts have been uncovered that relate to the US army' Dugway Proving Ground in Utah. They ask companies to tender for the production of bulk quantities of a non-virulent strain of anthrax, and for equipment to produce significant volumes of other biological agents. Issued earlier this year, the contracts were discovered by Edward Hammond, director of the Sunshine Project, a US-German organisation that campaigns against the use of biological and chemical weapons.

One "biological services" contract specifies: "The company must have the ability and be willing to grow Bacillus anthracis Sterne strain at 1500-litre quantities." Other contracts are for fermentation equipment for producing 3000-litre batches of an unspecified biological agent, and sheep carcasses to test the efficiency of an incinerator for the disposal of infected livestock.

Although the Sterne strain is not thought to be harmful to humans and is used for vaccination, the contracts have caused major concern. "It raises a serious question over how the US is going to demonstrate its compliance with obligations under the Biological Weapons Convention if it brings these tanks online," says Alan Pearson, programme director for biological and chemical weapons at the Center for Arms Control and Non- Proliferation in Washington DC. "If one can grow the Sterne strain in these units, one could also grow the Ames strain, which is quite lethal." The US renounced biological weapons in 1969, but small quantities of lethal anthrax were still being produced at Dugway as recently as 1998.

It is not known what use the biological agents will be put to. They could be used to test procedures to decontaminate vehicles or buildings, or to test an "agent defeat" warhead designed to destroy stores of chemical and biological weapons. There are even fears that they could be used to determine how effectively anthrax is dispersed when released from bombs or crop-spraying aircraft. "I can definitely see them testing biological weapons delivery systems for threat assessment," says Hammond.


http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-09/ns-uap092105.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps for vaccinations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Possibly, but since they're also planning to buy equipment to mass-
produce other biological agents, other nations may well be skeptical about our intentions. Hell, I'm skeptical ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yeah...right...they've had almost 15 years to do that. Read this ->>>
Edited on Sun Sep-25-05 08:26 AM by Roland99
THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ANTHRAX VACCINE IMMUNIZATION PROGRAM:

UNPROVEN FORCE PROTECTION

Pages 1--120

February 17, 2000 (2: 27PM)

http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/Anthrax/Anthrax_report_text.htm




That summary expresses much doubt as to the efficacy of a vaccination program.

Also, they should have been all set post-9/11/Anthrax attacks FOUR years ago. These contracts are from this year.

This administration hasn't been about defending this country, at least not within our own borders. They prefer taking the fight to the enemy. And, in situations where there is no clear enemy, they create one. That's why this program should be of concern to everyone.

And, here's another article on this story:
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn8044

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Exactly. And after seeing the things this administration is willing
to do in Iraq ... torture, napalm, rape ... I just don't trust them with this kind of technology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. They're going to hit
the National Enquirer again, for publishing the "Dubya's Drinking Again" story.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. That was the Weekly World News that was hit before
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. Time to scare the American public again? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Maybe, but their usual tactic is to make us afraid of OTHER
governments, not our own. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC