Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How many freakin ways can B** divide us? Now State vs State.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:41 AM
Original message
How many freakin ways can B** divide us? Now State vs State.
Just when you think there is no other way to divide us:
1. Red State vs. Blue State
2. Pro War vs. Anti War
3. Pro Life vs. Pro Choice
4. US vs. Rest of the World
5. Rich vs. Poor

He's created a a new environment where States are pitted against other States. C-SPAN callers from TN and Kentucky: "Why should we send recovery money down to LA and MS, they will just waste it?"

To me, Texas bragging about how much better they did responding to Rita than LA did with Katrina was another disgusting example. Why not be gracious and say how much they learned from LA?

Interesting that these are all red states, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Your's would be a thought provoking post, if you didn't then practice
divisiveness in the last sentence. Irony, you have to love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. AMEN.
Signed,
Texassippian.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think that the fact that they are all red states is quite pertinent,
actually. It is a completely new dimension that I have not observed until now. Although it does assume there was a unity among red states in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think the fact that the state administration of Louisiana is blue...
and 90% of the displaced, flooded-out people in Louisiana are blue, shows that you don't really know what you are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Thank you for you kind response. Yes, I am sure that those C-SPAN
callers from TN and KY would have been 100% for the $40b aid package sponsored by a democratic and a republican senator, if the people it helped were rich and had a republican governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. maybe blue states just don't count anymore..
now that they don't have liberals to kick around, they run on each other?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southlandshari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Why is it pertinent?
Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I think because it is primarily republicans against fellow republicans
I can't imagine a place that was primarily democratic being against helping democrats or republicans.

Didn't mean to ruffle feathers here. I know democrats living in red states still love their state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southlandshari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. It is a stretch, I think,
to say this is "primarily" Republicans against Republicans, especially considering the relatively small margin of victory Bush had in many of the states in question.

I know you are getting challenged here, but it sounds like you might understand the "other" perspective coming out at this point. Labeling states "red" or "blue" in situations like this is really way too broad a brush to paint with, IMO. It is also highly likely to result in angry responses - because it does exactly what your original post spoke against. It unnecessarily divides and polarizes people, including those who are supposed to be working together here.

Two pennies. For what they are worth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Red and Blue is a fact from the last election. It is merely represents
that the republicans won in the Red States and the democrats won in the blue states (leaving fraud aside).

I know that it is hard being a democrat in a red state (or if you prefer, a state that voted republican). I live in Texas now, 20 miles from Crawford.

The only bright side is that there are only a handful of states left that are still republican, if you look at SurveyUsa.com and use B** approval rating as a guide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southlandshari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. It isn't nearly as hard being a Democrat in a "red" state
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 01:37 PM by southlandshari
as it is listening to fellow Democrats use the red state-blue state nonsense in discussion as if these states were monolithic entities represented only by the majority political party in last year's election.

States don't vote, people do. And millions of people in "red" states voted "blue", so adopting the "us and them" language all the way up to the state level is impractical and divisive.

I think I and others here are simply reacting to the last line of the original post here:

"Interesting that these are all red states, isn't it?"

Sorry. Hot button issue for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I know it's hard.
I know that even if republicans win a state there were people who voted democratic. I was one. But it doesn't matter, unfortunately, given the winner take all situation. Look how close the "election" was on paper. None of that matters if they still control the house, senate, presidency, and soon courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southlandshari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Exactly.
Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunDrop23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. I thought the SAME thing about Texas (the bragging part)
No offense to anyone from Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Divide, conquer, etc. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. Also - Old Vs. young, immigrants vs. american workers, etc.
Horrible. The political arm of the WH knows no other way to power - other than destroying people who are minding their own business and trying to get along.

We will be crashing into each other for years to come if we keep listening to these creeps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. Get used to it
It's easy to divide people. Eventually all the people with blue eyes won't help the people with brown eyes. The hazel's won't know what to do. Don't get me started on the evil eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. and
young vs old

religious nuts vs true Christians

Evil (which he is) vs Good

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
17. This time, liberal Christians have the answer
If Jesus came back today, He'd say: "In Christ there is no red states or blue states; no pro-war or anti-war; no black, white, Asian, or Latino; no male or female; no gun rights or gun control; etc...all are one in Christ Jesus." (paraphrase of Bible)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
18. You use the Red/Blue divide yourself....
Just like Bush.

Where did Texans "brag" about their response to Rita? The Houston area is bigger & richer than NOLA. That helped. And our City & County officials knew they could expect NADA from the Feds. The State government's response was not so great.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. You forgot a couple.
6. Young vs. old
7. Men vs. women
8. Church vs. secular


True that some of these are natural "fault lines" but he sure drove the wedge in to the hilt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I think you are right. There are natural fault lines in society. Maybe
it is not such much what B** is doing but what he isn't doing. It takes a good leader to bring people together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. The states have ALWAYS
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 01:23 PM by ProudDad
been at each other's throats. The tension between state and federal is enshrined in the Constitution.

Why else would pissant Utah and Wyoming have 2 Senators just like the 9th largest economy in the world -- California? Why else would pissant Utah and Wyoming have proportionally more voting power in the Electoral College than California or New York? Why else would the country have been 1/2 slave and 1/2 free until 1865?

Personally, I'd like to see California Secede. We'd do a whole lot better economically and socially without the baggage of the fundy assholes in those damn red states (semi-serious).

Heck, we might even be able to become a Bolivarian Democracy!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. You reminded me of Father Brennan's quote in "The Omen"
When the Jews return to Zion
And a comet fills the sky
And the Holy Roman Empire rises,
Then you and I must die.
From the eternal sea he rises,
Creating armies on either shore,
Turning man against his brother
'Til man exists no more.

In otherwords, he's still hasn't turned every brother against against one another yet. But if the FEMA response to Katrina is any sign of things to come he'll have people fighting for the last scrape of food any day now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC