Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge deems big part of Bush's "healthy forests act" illegal!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
montana500 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:18 PM
Original message
Judge deems big part of Bush's "healthy forests act" illegal!
www.wilderness-sportsman.com

A California court has concluded that the USFS must allow environmental evaluations and public involvement in any sized USFS project. The Bush admin had sought to wipe out any kind of public involvement or NEPA evaluation on projects smaller than a couple thousand acres. That would have given the green light to log roadless and non-roadless portions of national forest lands without ANY public involvement or requirement to look for rare species and possible damage to water quality. This was a huge part of the "healthy forest act" that industry donors were salivating over. Now, they will be kicking and screaming once again :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. There is no part of this land that Bush does not want to destroy....
for the good of his rich cronies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You've got that right..........
"clean air", healthy forests".......it's all a sham. Where it concerns the environment, bush always does exactly the opposite of what his "plan" suggests it's supposed to do. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fighttotheend Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. You said and too bad not enough ppl realize it...
www.defenders.org
needs some voices to help the Endangered Species Act
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hahahahahaha. Too bad for BushCo! May this be the beginning of
a long succession of reversals on their stupid greedy laws benefiting only * friends!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Damned Librul Calaforneeens......
I always wondered about the legality of this, I hope the higher courts don't over-rule this finding. If it gets to the Supremes, you know which way it's going to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Hopefully not... we will just continue to fight this and not
stop our fight for what is right. The generations after us will be more than just grateful.

Once we get the upper hand again, as I trust we will, we will just have to make sure that respect for the environment is nailed down tighter than it was when this crew took over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fighttotheend Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Now the Endangered Species Act is under attack, and we need your help..
www.defenders.org
sign and help!!!
America's national symbol was once almost lost forever. But today, the bald eagle once again soars over our nation ... thanks in large part to the Endangered Species Act. to save it.

Forward this message to a friend...

Yesterday the influential House Resources Committee voted 26-12 to advance a bill that would severely undermine the Endangered Species Act. The legislation, introduced earlier this week by Representative Richard Pombo (R-CA), would dismantle key protections for wolves, bald eagles and other endangered wildlife.

The full House could vote on this bill as soon as Tuesday. Please send a message to your Representative right now urging him or her to vote against the Pombo bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Sorry, my congressman is Denny Hastert.
He doesn't vote unless there is a tie - which means he never votes or represents us in our district. And if he was a voting kind of guy, my bet is that he could care less about the Endangered Species Act because it takes good money out of the hands of developers...

Only hope I have is that we vote him out in 2006 because of the overwhelming evidence (please, please, please) in the Turkish money campaign scandal brewing on his horizon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. There behind the glass
stands a real blade of grass. Be careful as you pass... move along, move along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. They should get a fine and penalty for naming it Healthy Forest Act
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 04:30 PM by Mountainman
Why do they always call something what it isn't. They know people won't support it if they told the truth. That in itself should be cause for imprisonment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Trout in Montana win in a separate decision!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. "A California Court"
that's all they need to know to dismiss the ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. loggers better hurry to strip all the forests
bewfore this can be enforced. I wonder how long a "delay" they will get to accomplish their task, so they can say "Oops--too late!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. Never fear, the new Bush SCOTUS is here!
With their radical justices riubber-stamped by our "hard fighting" Vichy Dems! Yay! Like that sage Reagan said, trees pollute. Betcha that will be the SCOTUS ruling when they reinstate healthy forests - see, trees pollute so the forests will be healthier without them! Thanks dems, for rubber-stamping the * scotus appointees!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC