Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Okay, so here's the "devastating" KERRY Campaign Flick

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 02:55 PM
Original message
Okay, so here's the "devastating" KERRY Campaign Flick
Remember yesterday there was something in the NY Daily News about a "devastating" behind-the-scenes look at the Kerry campaign?

Well, there are some clips up at Political Wire (http://www.politicalwire.com), AND... sorry if I'm a little underwhelmed. Some are kind of funny, but they don't strike me as anything out of the ordinary for a political campaign. Hell, there are West Wing-scenes that are more contentious than that.

And the moment where Hillary Clinton "cringes" and "rolls her eyes" at a Kerry-gaffe in the debate? She's rolling her eyes at Bush's "got wood?" moment.

Anyway, take a look for yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Definitively underwhelmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Agree. There's not much here to shame Kerry --
-- especially when almost any citizen of the world can -- in a click of a mouse -- see the horrifying images of Abu Graib prison, a U.S.-run torture chamber.

"Bringing democracy to the Middle East!" the Bush administration like to say.

The images from Abu Graib say different, and history will record those as destroying what very little validity Bush had for the assault in the first place.

This film on Kerry will do no serious damage, permanent or otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. What is the pony thing about?
Edited on Tue Sep-27-05 03:12 PM by Goldeneye
I was laughing sooo hard. What are they talking about?

edited for punctuation and to add that I thought the NYT magazine picture was really good. I tore it off and kept it. Also, I don't understand why the staffers would swear so much when they knew they were being filmed, but other than that I didn't see anything to weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I have no idea
And is that the most incriminating thing they can find? It sounds like a campaign inside joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. It was an inside joke
However, I think the point was that the advance team was asked to waste time doing stupid things that had nothing to do with winning an election and then got reamed out when they didn't fulfill a ridiculous request.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Marvin's birthday
And I love the swearing because I swear like that all the time and so does everybody else I know. Compared to some other shitty pictures, the NYT was good, but there are so many that are ten times better. The worst pictures possible were consistently used last year. I know the picture situation drove me nuts, and alot of other people I talked to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Ah, the swearing...
I don't mind it. Swearing is pretty much part of life, but why swear when you know your being filmed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Because it's honest
Why pretend nobody swears? Quite enough of that kind of holier-than-thou hypocrisy, as far as I'm concerned. Glad the Kerry people didn't participate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I guess that makes sense.
I'm just thinking how I wouldn't swear in front of my grandma, but this isn't quite the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Look at the PONYTIME clip.
It's about a birthday prank they played on Marvin. It's cute. Has very little to do with Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting; why was this done? Is someone or a bunch of
yokels feeling threatened, perhaps? Another smear campaign? I too was underwhelmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. RW smears, clearly
Edited on Tue Sep-27-05 03:18 PM by Mass
Dont know who the author of this movie is, but a comment that he makes about the SB ("the problem is that the Swift Boat is largely true") made me jump.

In addition, the original article was written by a RW gossip columnist.

And the remark about Hillary was clearly made to oppose Kerry and Clinton's teams. It is clear that she rolls her eyes at Bush's bad joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. On Hillary
That's what I thought too and I'm glad to see it. Sounds like more shit to divide Dems. Who wrote that about her rolling eyes again? I don't remember and I want to keep track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Crystal clear.
I don't see any way you can read that as her rolling her eyes at anything Kerry said.

I loved Seti's comment afterwards = "That's weird..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. Was it at least interesting in a behind the scenes sort of way
if one is interested in inner workings and such?

So the Clinton staffers were salvating in vain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. DAMN! That was
duller than dishwater, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. I thought the debates...
... were the high point of the Kerry campaign myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyhappy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. I have been so tough on kerry
since the election...and he did drive me nuts.

but dammit...seeing that footage of him I just cannot believe that he is not our president.

welcome to the twilight zone...grrrrrr!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well, the NY Daily News IS rightwing, isn't it
It's amazing to me to see folks except the word of a Right Wing rag when it's about somebody they have an issue with. When did papers like the Boston Herald or the NYDN suddenly become credible sources for progressive news? When they dis a Dem you're upset with, that's when.

And a Right Wing rag's GOSSIP COLUMN, to boot. Geez Louise!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Not really. Slightly right. It's the NY Post that's the rightwing rag. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Heh. Oopsie.
Still a gossip column and all, one that seemed to be trying to portray both Clinton and Kerry in a bad light.

Do Lloyd Grove's politics normally show? If so, which way does he tend to lean?

All in all, I suppose it doesn't matter much. Grove's job is to make something out of nothing to sell papers. I just wish some weren't so ready to swallow a bit of nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Nope, he's just showbiz. I read his items sometimes from Salon's "The Fix"
gossip column.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I'm old enough to remember when
The New York Post was a great liberal newspaper. Such a loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. That wasn't even a Kerry gaffe
His point was Bush had a small amount of (passive) business income that per their definitions would count him as small business. (From memory it was less than $100 and the company had Lumber in its name.) The point was they were saying that many in the top 1% or 2% were really self employed people whose business income is taxed via their personal income. Kerry's point was correct and well taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. The problem was that Kerry said that Bush owned part of a
lumber company which turned out to be completely not true.

Bush isn't the swiftest, but he was fast enough to jump on that gaffe and it made for one of the weirder moments in debate history.

Turns out that Bush's tax returns showed he had a royalty check from a company called Crosstimbers, which is an oil company. I guess one of Kerry's people saw that on the tax return and assumed it was a lumber company which is pretty funny since there isn't any lumber in West Texas other than tumbleweeds and mesquite.

Anyway, it was a truly weird debate moment.

Kerry could have at least comeback saying that he didn't know what kind of a company it was but his point was that Bush owned a little bit of some company, but he just stood there and absorbed the laughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Anyway, No big deal there
Edited on Tue Sep-27-05 06:45 PM by Mass
and it seems pretty clear that Clinton was rolling eyes at Bush. (nearly nobody got what Bush meant, and he really look weird).

But thanks for the explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. okay, I understand
I really didn't see it that way - as Bush was very strange. It wasn't Kerry's turn to speak - so I think that would have violated the rules. I heard no one call it a gaffe afterwards. (Compared to the millions of Bush mistakes calling Crosstimbers a timber company seems insignificant.) There is no way to spin that Kerry didn't win all three debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. I haven't heard that it wasn't a lumber co as you say, however
no one listening or watching the debate would have known it wasn't a lumber co. That information wasn't shared with the audience. And the location wasn't mentioned either. It is possible to be part owner of business outside your residential state. I think I recall reading that it was in fact a lumber co. that Bush earned income on. I recall it being proven that Bush was actually misinformed-not Kerry. And the laughter was over Bush's corney joke and I believe Kerry did smile at the joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. I know I'm suppose to be upset over this BUT
the only thing I saw offensive was the swiftboat liars, and that guy who said they were right...

I liked watching the clips. It was humorous watching Kerry complaining of the heat and smell in that locker room. "Whoever worked out in here last left a part of themselves". Haha - I know that feeling!

And it was AWESOME seeing that Ohio rally with Bruce singing, and the huge huge crowds.

sigh.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
30. Wow...people were cussing and stuff...OMG!
I totally agree...underwhelming...and if anything, people get a chance to see some of the behind the scenes stuff...

I have some footage of people being kicked out of Bush rallies because they had a t-shirt that had a peace sign on it...I wonder if that would be funny to a Chimphead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
32. The best parts were seeing Kerry again and hearing
"No retreat, No surender".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC