|
New Yorker guy on Charlie Rose- NOLA people believe that they have been pushed out of NOLA, they are not wanted, they know they will never return ( the poor) and that the rupture of the levee's was somehow part of a planned gentrification.
Their memory goes back to 1927 when certain levee's were blown up to save the city and the poor neighborhoods were sacrificed.
He is saying that the resurrection of the city as it was, is improbable. The city was poor, had no corporate headquarters, no property tax base and that people were leaving for years. Slowly leaving. He paints a picture of a dying city whose main business was tourism, which can be replaced by Vegas or NY.
But the diaspora of the poor is probably permanent.
This counter narrative, arising out of poverty, the rumors with -in the poor sectors, reflective of the displacement, sorrow, poverty, and powerlessness of the people of NOLA.
This is much sadder than even I knew until I heard this tonight.
I feel really, really saddened that the life those people led will never come back. A sorrow as must have been felt when Alexandria was lost to the sea. We are seeing the end of a historical era, a time and place that was not of 21st century chrome, petrol, microchip America. A place of dark cultures, strange mores, cults, and voodoo, who do you do, voodoo. African roots at surface, Cajun roots for all to see, the food, the smells, the music in the air. A wild theme park for repressed adults who can act out in ways there, as no where else
Author: David Remnick: High Water,The New Yorker.
Sad end of great city and wonderful people who will, as a subculture, be no more.:cry:
|