Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DeLay said the charge couldn't hold up to even a glancing scrutiny

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:30 AM
Original message
DeLay said the charge couldn't hold up to even a glancing scrutiny


I don't think it's possible for a scrutiny to be glancing. the two are incompatible.

could Tommy be rattled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tompayne1 Donating Member (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. no it is just standard tactics
Spin until you vomit. Then again he might be vomitting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yup, he's rattled...he wasn't supposed to be indicted...
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 11:36 AM by truebrit71
...and Lt AWOL's spin-monkey was busy yesterday putting as much distance between them and Roach-man as humanly possible without leaving skidmarks in their wake....

Delay is going down...and like the true, rat-fuck son-of-a-bitch that he is, when he gets dropped like a smelly turd by his gop 'friends' he will squeal like a pig on the whole lot of them...

Good times, good times!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. 90% of criminals in prison swear they are innocent. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah, you'd think there'd be one or two guilty guys in all those prisons
DeLay will fit right in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Sadly, if I understood the lawyer's post on the DU home page
Delay can't receive prison time for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Delay says "Nothing to see here ,move along, don't even glance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's tough to glance with bars in front of your face, let alone scrutinize
Get used to it, Tommy Boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. What about the other forty some indictments issued in this case?
Those indictments charged over 100 crimes by DeLay's people, organizations, and contributors. And there already have been several guilty pleas entered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. And the guilty pleas are the key.
Those people are probably turning state's evidence for reduced sentences - little bugs giving up the big cockroach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. And there you have your GOP talking point in your headline...
wait for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. My scrutiny itches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. It depends on how the jury's stacked
I wouldn't put it past Bugboy's sleazy lawyer to stack the jury to favor him. I heard Kay Bailey Hutchison did the same thing: stack the jury with consymps (conservative sympathizers).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think we will let the judge and jury be the judge of that Tommy. No
offense, but we dont exactly trust your judgement of what is or is not felonius behavior on your part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sepia_steel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. He had to have meant
GLARING scrutiny. I heard him say that during his speech. Typical illiterate freep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
15. Well that's why you'll get to be
the defendant at the trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladylibertee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
16. He's going down.He knows it.That is why he is "bluffing" so hard
and putting on this fake cocky grin like everything is under control.Look at his behavior.If he was not worried,he would not be so "overly" about it"Oh, the republicans are united" " this is a political attack" " this wont hold up" I don't know, but from a behavioristic view, he's scared out of his mind right now because someone seriously betrayed him and he is BUSTED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC