Republicans take aim at energy restrictionsBy WHITNEY ROYSTER
Star-Tribune environmental reporter
with wire reports Friday, September 30, 2005
Hoping to ride the wave of concern resulting from Gulf Coast hurricanes, U.S. Rep. Barbara Cubin and other congressional Republicans are trying again to loosen some restrictions on oil and gas development.
The proposals didn't make it in the recently approved energy bill, but supporters say Hurricanes Katrina and Rita -- which hit some energy suppliers on the Gulf Coast -- show the need to eliminate some environmental restrictions if the domestic energy supply is rattled.
<snip>
Peter Aengst with the Wilderness Society called the bill "a wish-list for industry."
"The main concern is that we have a system of checks and balances where we allow oil and gas development, but don't let it go to such an extreme that it trashes other values," such as air quality, water quality, habitat and wildlife, he said. "This bill basically would put in place measures that would fundamentally take away (those) checks and balances."
<more>
http://www.casperstartribune.net/articles/2005/09/30/news/wyoming/3628fd0e959a1cf98725708a0002562a.txtNew Energy Bill Would Grease the Skids for Unfettered Oil and Gas Drilling on Public LandsSeptember 27, 2005 (Washington, DC) - The new House Resources Committee Republican energy bill scheduled for committee action on Wednesday would not only authorize Arctic Refuge oil and gas leasing and drilling and end the 25-year bipartisan congressional moratorium on Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) leasing, but would also codify a number of extreme proposals that could lead to essentially unregulated drilling on Bureau of Land Management lands. The bill would also cut the public out of drilling decisions on public lands, by prohibiting administrative appeals or judicial review for any BLM leasing decisions. The bill is scheduled to be marked up on Wednesday, September 28 in the House Resources Committee.
"This absurd new bill won't do anything for the people who need help right now. It would only ensure more damage to our public lands and that local citizens and governments couldn't do a thing about it," said Dave Alberswerth of The Wilderness Society. "At a time when natural disasters are showing us how important it is to be more careful where we put drill rigs and pipelines, it seems beyond crass that the oil and gas industry and its backers are trying to take advantage in a way that will increase their profits."
Proponents of offshore and Arctic Refuge drilling point to high prices at the pump as a reason to remove current protections against drilling. But a new report from the Department of Energy predicts that the impact on gas prices of drilling the Arctic Refuge would only amount to about one penny per gallon twenty years from now, when drilling would be at or near peak production. The Arctic Refuge drilling provisions contained in this legislation and in the Resources Committee's pending reconciliation language also include sweeping exemptions from environmental laws and regulations.
The bill also would prohibit any administrative or judicial review of BLM leasing decisions, despite the fact that the production of gas from on-shore sources is at an all-time high and heading toward another record year. The bill would make all BLM leasing decisions final, prohibiting lawsuits and protests, even where leases are offered in proposed wilderness areas, critical wildlife migration corridors, and recreational sites. The current appeal provisions serve as important "checks and balances" - especially in this time of BLM processing record nominations by industry and issuing record numbers. For example, landowners, outfitters, and even the Governor of Wyoming have all used the appeal provisions during the last few years to stop damaging lease proposals from the BLM. The bill would also legalize the use of industry-paid consultants to help the BLM issue drilling permits.
http://www.wilderness.org/NewsRoom/Release/20050927.cfm