Miers Hearing Should Include Plame Questions!!!!!

[styersc]

While we have her under oath we can grill her on what Bush knew about Plame!!!! Her counsel is not confidential in regards to illegal activity!!! This can be a godsend.

[ashling]

1. good point

:thumbsup:

[cally]

2. Good point! She can be forced to answer questions on this

Go, Fitz, go!!!

[styersc]

3. If Bush was comvinced that he could leak Plame's name "legally"...

he almost certainly got the advice from Miers.

[renie408]

4. An oath is not truth serum

Do you really think she is going to say, "Oh, busted!! He knew about the whole thing and it was even his idea."??

[styersc]

6. No, but you record her answers...

...and compare them to secret (unleaked) testimony gathrered by Fitzgerald. When there is a deviation- let the games begin. I can't imagine that anyone would ever consider perjury or obstruction an impreachable offense.

[halobeam]

7. You make a good point, but would she be safe in lying?

It could very well come out later, if she did, am I right? Honest question.

[renie408]

9. I dunno

I just have faith that if it has occurred to somebody here, it will have occurred to them. I figure if it comes up, she will have a slick answer-that-is-no-answer or an uncatchable lie handy.

[Marnieworld]

5. Holy Shit! Excellent point!

I think I love your mind! :woohoo:

[OneGrassRoot]

8. Ooooh, oooooh, ooooooh...............

(doing Arnold Horshack...lol)

If this is true, you should blast the Dems!!!! Great point!!!

:applause:

[styersc]

10. One can only hope that the "powers that be" will remember how

Starr used the opportunity of Paula Jones to trip up Clinton.