|
I'm a Clark supporter, and I've been pretty critical of Dean's post-Iowa victory speech, in part because I felt that, fair or not, it unnecessarily gave his detractors' claims that he was a 'hothead' legitimacy, and partly because I thought that the theatrics looked way too forced and were 'too much' in the context of the results. I'm solidly ABB, and the less ammunition we give the media and the Republicans, the better off we'll be in November.
My reaction to Dean's post-Iowa speech was similar to the reaction many here on DU (including me) have had re: Lieberman's speech last night. There is optimism, and then there is fairytale land. Lieberman is in the latter right now.
Dean's speech after Iowa, while arguably made after a better result than Lieberman had last night, just seemed like an overreaction to a unexpected loss. I felt that he was just trying too hard to compensate for coming in a distant third, especially in the context of the subdued interview he'd had on CNN less than an hour before.
That being said, Dean's speech last night was MUCH better. It looked honest, it looked real, and he was able to convey real emotion and get out the message without the antics of last week. No rolled-up sleeves. No yelling state names. Just controlled anger and a determination to tell the public WHY we want to take the country back, and that's a good thing.
It proved to me that he's more ready to play in the big leagues than I have given him credit for. Hopefully, it also proved to Dean and many of his supporters that he doesn't have to scream and yell and 'yeagh' to get his point across.
The bottom line is that it's all about how the average voter interprets our candidates. I think Mr. or Ms. Average Voter is going to relate to the post-NH Dean much better than the post-Iowa one. I hope that last night's speech was more indicative of the 'real' Dr. Dean.
|