...weapons. That's what all this "his royalness" is about. It is the exact opposite of "all men are created equal." One man holds the power of life and death over all, and thus enters of the realm of pharaohs and emperors, who can't be touched or spoken to. Add in the remoteness and naked fear of the super-rich, as they horde and protect their ungodly gains at the expense of the poor, and you have double-whammy of TYRANNY. Same old, same old, we've been fighting for 10,000 years. The Great Leap Backward--that's what future historians will call this era, if there are any future historians. Backward to monarchy. Backward to empire and oppression. Backward to slavery and cannon fodder.
Just remember this. We are a revolutionary country, based on brand new principles of equality, born of the 15th and 16th centuries Enlightenment, and enshrined in our law. The idea was that, with democratic participation in society's decisions, and open debate, the aggregate of all ideas and interests would lead to wisdom, prosperity and progress, and that, when, for some reason, this aggregate wisdom failed--for instance, when power hungry men grabbed the reins of power, or duped the people--the country would be able to correct its wrong course democratically, through public debate and voting.
And when power hungry men have monopolized most of the means of public discourse?
And when power hungry men have gained control of the vote tabulation with secret, proprietary programming code?
You know the answer to the second question: Throw these election theft machines into 'Boston Harbor' and start over!
And, when you have recovered your right to vote, then you bust up the news monopolies that are stifling public discourse, and, following that, you bust up the so-called "Defense" establishment, remove the war profiteers, and re-think what "defense" means. (Are nukes a defense against terrorists? What are they a defense against? And who is profiting from their proliferation? And who is outing covert agents whose job is non-proliferation? Etc. You now have the room, the venue, the votes to ask questions and arrive at wise, consensus decisions.)
Some reverse these priorities--thinking that the news monopolies are the worst problem, and must be dealt with first. They are, after all, the reason that the people do not know about the "trade secret," proprietary programming in their voting system, nor about the evidence that those secret formulae, controlled by Bushite corporations, produced the wrong result.
And there is a lot to be said for that--and for guerrilla news (like this, at DU), most certainly.
Obviously, we must do both, if we are to create American Revolution II. Transparent elections. Uncontrolled political debate.
We have a window of opportunity on transparent elections, and must take advantage of it. This "window" exists in the state and local jurisdictions, where control over election systems still resides, and where ordinary people still have some influence. There is serious corruption at this level, in the billion dollar boondoggle of electronic voting, but it is nevertheless closer to the people and easier to reform. The Fed politicians are gradually eroding local control of elections, and cynically calling it "reform." The more they bribe the states with money to buy into the corrupt electronic voting industry, and make national rules (like the "Voter ID" that Bush's "pod people" in Congress are likely to pass), the faster our "window of opportunity" for real election reform is closing.
Info and action:
"MythBreakers," an excellent pamphlet on electronic voting:
http://www.votersunite.org Help with election monitoring projects for 2006 and 2008:
http://www.UScountvotes.org