|
Edited on Wed Jan-28-04 02:51 PM by tryanhas
He cut social programs like a mad man in Vermont to balance the budget and provide health care.
Provide Health care...he was a doctor?
Provide Health care......he was a doctor??
Provide Health care.........he was a doctor???
Sounds to me like Doctor Dean wanted to make sure that his doctor buddies, including his wife, got paid.
Now, sure some will say that "HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT? PROVIDING HEALTH CARE HELPED THE PEOPLE OF VERMONT."
Only problem with that is he screwed the poor in Vermont. He cut state aid to education ($6 million), retirement funds for teachers and state employees ($7 million), health care ($4 million), welfare programs earmarked for the aged, blind and disabled ($2 million), Medicaid benefits ($1.2 million) and more, amounted to roughly $30 million. Dean claimed that the cuts were necessary because the state had no money and was burdened by a $60 million deficit...(Rutland Herald: see Christopher Graff, "Governor set to cut spending," July 11, 1995. Also see, Chris Graff, "Dean balancing act enters tough phase," December 17, 1995 and Diane Derby, "Hundreds protest governor’s plan to cut Medicaid," November 2, 1993.)...but during the same period, Dean found $7 million for a low-interest loan program for businesses, $30 million for a new prison in Springfield, VT, and he cut the income tax by 8 percent (equivalent to $30 million)–a move many in the legislature balked at because they didn’t feel comfortable "cutting taxes in a way that benefits the wealthiest taxpayers" (Jack Hoffman, "Budget boosts housing; VIDA funds," Rutland Herald, September 9, 1992; Frederick Bever, "Dean wants larger cut in state tax," Rutland Herald, December 23, 1998; Jack Hoffman, "Dean outlines his case for cutting income tax," Rutland Herald, January 9, 1999.)...By 2002, state investments in prisons increased by nearly 150 percent while investments in state colleges increased by only 7 percent.Interview with Anthony Pollina by Democracy In Action at the Progressive Party offices in Montpelier, Vermont, July 9, 2002. Anthony Pollina ran for governor against Dean on the Progressive Party ticket in 2000. Available at www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/dean/dean0702/pollinaint.html.
He claimed that the cuts were NECESSARY BECAUSE OF THE DEFICIT.
"necessary because of the deficit."
"NECESSARY BECAUSE OF THE DEFICIT."
Umph, we are in a very large national deficit right now. "the cuts were necessary because of Vermont's deficit."
So, if Dean gets into office, he is going to cut social programs like a mad man because of the deficit just like he did in Vermont, on the backs of the poor and sick and middle/working class.
|