Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Any DUer who is not for ABB should be banned from DU...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:08 PM
Original message
Any DUer who is not for ABB should be banned from DU...
Edited on Fri Jan-30-04 10:40 PM by TruthIsAll
The 33% who said they would not vote for Kerry in the DU poll are either Bush/Rove trolls, or just plain stupid.

You would rather have Bush remain in the office he stole by refusing to support the nominee if he's not your guy?

Are you saying that you would be willing to sacrifice the lives of your children who would fight in Bush's future wars, rather than vote for Kerry?

Are you saying that you would be willing to let BushCo complete its fascist takeover of your democracy?

Are you saying that you are willing to let let Bush finish the job of destroying the social programs which the democratic party has fought for since FDR?

Talk about cutting off your nose...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I live in texasno way kerry could win And please enough of those lame
ass excuses for weak dems losing!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joseph Thule Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Texas? NO Democrat will win Texas. I don't think a Democrat has won TX
in 25 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. my thoughts exactly and yet people call me a bush supporter when i say
i will vote green if my guy doesnt get it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joseph Thule Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I have no problem there. Your vote is pretty much "pointless"
electorally speaking.

It's the tools voting Green in the battleground states that I can't stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamrsilva Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
50. Me too. No point in voting for Kerry
No way Bush isn't winning it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. Banning doesn't seem very 'democratic'
Dean '04...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
codegreen Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. banning seems extreme, but i concur with the sentiment
this is the Democratic Underground. not the "i'm going Green if it isn't Dean" underground. this is the battle of our lives. our country, our whole country may be over if Bush gets re-elected.

if you're not down with ABB, then you're totally out of your mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
42. There's a difference....
There's a difference between DemocraticUnderground.com and DemocraticPartyUnderground.com. This notion of banning non-ABBers reeks of the same Rove/Bush "with us or against us" bullshit that we're supposed to be fighting against.

Grow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #42
68. You are effectively fighting FOR Rove/Bush if you are not ABB
I thought we learned this in 2000 when Nader's votes caused Gore to lose FL and NH.

What the hell is the point of sitting it out if the Dem is not your first choice?

You are playing right into the hands of Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is going to be extremely rude, but I agree n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wish I had voted
"no" just to be able to alert this topic and possibly getting you banned.

Seriously - are you really trying to suggest that people clicking on a link are doing anything more than venting an emotion, such as really, seriously committing to a vote?

If so, I think it's time for you to log off and breathe some fresh air for a little bit.

"Voting intention" polls on this board aren't that much representative beyond reflecting the mood of the moment, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Amen.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oxymoron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. just plain stupid is right.
I have been amazed at the idiocy of some of these posts. If you're not ABB, and don't vote for the nominee, then you're not a Democrat and I can't be bothered. There are too many things that need to be done to get * out of the White House and take back our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Excuse me a moment
How do you know that some of the people who voted the way they did in that poll aren't just trying to let a little air out of the swelled and arrogant heads of some of the Kerry supporters here? As for requiring ABB, there isn't a loyalty oath like that at this time in order to be a member of this board ... once the primaries have decided the nominee then you will have your wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. No loyalty oath. Just common sense. We can agree to disagree.
But as far as Bush is concerned, we must draw the line.

We need every damn vote to get the Dem landslide we will need to defeat Diebold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. I have stated on this board there's no way I'll vote for John Kerry.
It's very likely I could change my mind even though I'll never change my mind that I think he's a skunk and that the Democratic Party will continue it's slow death with someone like him in charge. I've changed my mind in the voting booth on issues I was sure about and then rethought. So, when you see a poll like that or statements like the ones I've made keep that in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Anyone who calls themselves ABB, but says a candidates name...
...needs to be banned from DU for inciting flamewars.

ABB is AGNOSTIC and thus any candidate name mentioned with ABB means that you're implying that said candidate is the only one capable (thus invaliding the whole ABB concept).

I voted NO in the Kerry/Bush poll because it follows this stupid line of thinking that one candidate is the only possible nominee choice. No ifs/ands/or buts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snoochie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. THANK YOU
gah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I'd agree with your point if this sentiment hadn't been
expressed in numerous non-poll threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. Everyone is guilty of it.
A whole lot of people go ABB and then state their candidate! They USE the ABB idea to suggest that THEIR candidate is THE ONE that is "Anybody" but Bush.

Hell, in the Dykes for Dean thread someone had the gall to imply that any presidential candidate that supports lesbians/gays isn't electible and people who vote for Dean weren't ABB! THINK ABOUT THAT.

HOLY #$)(*. This is making my blood pressure go up so badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. I always took ABB to mean that I'm for Candidate X
but if he doesn't win I will vote for whoever the nominee is.

Anybody means anybody (with the exception of Larouche)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Sure, that's fine, but people use ABB to uphold their candidate.
Thet go "my candidate is the only one who's electable, and if you don't vote for him, you're not ABB!"

Guess what? We have a primary process. We can vote for whoever the fuck we want without it conflicting with ABB. ABB is a national election issue and SHOULD NOT EVEN BE BROUGHT UP until election time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snoochie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. You're right, of course
Everyone is so scared.

I need a hug. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #47
60. ::HUG::
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #34
51. that's EXACTLY what I mean
I am for Edwards, but will vote ABB.

All of the posters in this thread who say that statements like mine are a thinly veiled statement that "only MY candidate can beat Bush..." well, there you go again, telling other people what their "real" thoughts, feelings, and motives are.

The behavior of a certain candidate's supporters disgusts me enough to make me CONSIDER staying home in November if he's the nominee, but I know I could never do it. Voting is a precious right. I'll exercise it, holding my nose if I have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:36 PM
Original message
Obviously there are geniune ABBers
I wasn't intending to put everyone who was ABB into a corner, just those who use ABB to support some ideology so... inconsistent with ABB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
65. I fail to see how anyone could be anything BUT
ABB.....but of course, we all have preferences. I have a preference for Edwards. That means that I talk him up among friends and am on his e-mail list and will send him money if I ever get any. That does not mean that I will do guerilla warfare on internet boards, accusing other people of malevolence if they don't like him and generally making an ass of myself. I hope Edwards gets it. If he doesn't, oh well, I'll vote for whoever has D by their name. If that's Lieberman as President and my cat as VP, okay, that's who'll I'll vote for. My cat WOULD be a better President than * -- of that, I have no doubt.

I don't comprehend the thinking behind people who love their candidate so much that they won't vote for the Dem, regardless of who it is. I mean, have any of our guys donated a kidney to one of the posters here, or paid off their mortgage, or taken a bullet for them? I doubt it. They're all good men, and although my personal opinions about their intelligence, experience, positions, etc., varies from the utmost respect to a gruding tolerance, ANY OF THEM WOULD BE BETTER THAN *!!! HENCE, I AM FOR ABB!!!

Is this really so difficult to understand??

Sigh. I need a hug, too. I'm getting a migraine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. ::hug:: =)
I don't mean to come down on you, I really don't. Please read my ABB thread about ABB before the primaries... you'll see what I'm saying, I hope...

I have seen all sorts of arguments using ABB to bash people, though, and I don't think it's right before the primaries are over and we actually have a candidate... :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. you can say that again
ther is something real annoying about that attitude. One doubts the sincerity of their intentions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoctorBombay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. I actually brought this up in a PM to someone..
..I would agree, but only after the nomination is sewn up. Once it becomes Bush vs. Whomever, and you aren't supporting the Dem, you ought not to be here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. That's going to happen
Once the nominee is decided, the admins have stated that they will not allow attacks against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoctorBombay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Good to know, thanks
Didn't catch that before..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. I am strongly ABB...
but there is no reason for censorship.

Ideas should always be debated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. And there is a point to debating someone who starts a thread
that proclaims if Dean isn't the nominee he's voting for Bush?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
59. Please Note That in 1972,
Hunter Thompson had such contempt for Hubert Humphrey that he said that if HHH were nominated, he would vote for Richard Nixon. It was the most shocking thing the good doctor ever wrote, from my point of view.

By those rules, HT would be banned from DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #59
72. HST got a lot nastier
about Humphrey than that I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. Fuck that!
Edited on Fri Jan-30-04 10:20 PM by Sean Reynolds
Last I checked this wasn't a forum JUST for Democrats, but for anyone that has the liberal ideology.

I don't believe in the term, the lesser of two evils. That was how we ended up with Bush in the first place. I will work my heart out to help a candidate win in the general election; whether or not he has a (D) by his name has yet to be seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joseph Thule Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. "Democratic" Underground.
Not "Liberal" Underground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. "Democratic" means DEMOCRACY - as in a Democratic government!
Edited on Fri Jan-30-04 10:23 PM by Sean Reynolds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
62. Little d democratic
Read the rules. You know, where it says lefties of all stripes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CheshireCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. I worry about this happening!
Edited on Fri Jan-30-04 10:23 PM by CheshireCat
#1 issue is DEFEAT BUSH!!

I do not understand any Democratic or leftwinger who would withhold their vote because their candidate is not the nominee - not when the alternative Georgie Boy runing the show for another 4 years!.

Hey, I used to be an idealistic voter, so who am I to talk!

Banning is goingtoo far!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ermoore Donating Member (474 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. Actually . . .
How would it be so great to elect someone basically indistinguishable from Bush? Then in four years we're just stuck with either him or whatever right-winger the republes nominate. Better in 2004 to have a real chance at electing someone who will bring real change to the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. Wow...
some of you Kerry folk are touchy. I'll vote for Kerry if he ends up being the nominee, but I won't be very enthused by doing so.

There are quite a few people here who are looking beyond bush and they see that the Democratic Party is desperately in need of reform. Kerry won't do that. That is why some are not so eager to rally to his flag.

Let's just see how the primaries play out. There will be plenty of time later on to get our panties in bunch, cast recriminations and play I told you so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oxymoron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. I am not a Kerry person.
Edited on Fri Jan-30-04 10:27 PM by oxymoron
And yeah, I'm touchy on this subject. There is far too much at stake. And any of the Democratic candidates are FAR better than the fascist we have in office. Let me clarify though, I don't support censorship on DU, I am just incredulous at some peoples stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. I am NOT a Kerry supporter; in fact I lean to Clark.
But I would vote for YOU if you were the candidate..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. freedom of speech
you're suggesting this be a no free speech zone then ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
28. What?! Is it already a fascist state? Or is it just weak Democrats
who need loyalty oaths?

:puke:

Living in the USSR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. For once, we agree
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
43. I have a feeling we will agree more often than not
Edited on Fri Jan-30-04 10:32 PM by Tinoire
once we get past these Primaries. This is really no small or insincere compliment ok? But even though I distrust Clark, I really like a lot of his supporters. There are 2 Clark DUers in my area that I've known a long time from activist events and really like, there are a few more in my area I would really like to meet after the Primaries, and there are many more I am sorry I will never get to meet. Please take that sincerely because that's how it's meant. It took a few PMs but I eat crow for having thought that there was no way a real progressive could like Clark. Yes, I eat crow- many of you (I have no idea how many) definitely are.

Thanks very much. No matter how much I personally distrust Clark, he has some really fine people supporting him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #43
52. Youre a good woman Cass
I feel the same, I am no fan of Clark for reasons I wont specify but some of his supporters are old friends and I wont lose friendship. I would prefer you all to support the nominee :D but I am not gonna force you to vote a certain way. When I was exclusively for DK, I hated us being labled Naderites. All is good. I am sorta ABB but not really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #52
63. but I am not gonna force you to vote a certain way.
> but I am not gonna force you to vote a certain way.

Well thank you, my Lord. Shall I fetch your slippers?

What a hoot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #43
53. OMG! Thank you Tinoire!
I most definitely know what a major compliment that is, coming from you. It really cheers me to hear this, and I greatly admire both your research skills and your strong support of Dennis. Any candidate would be lucky to have a supporter such as yourself. Keep fighting the good fight! :toast:

ps-I saw a Kucinich ad on New England Cable News yesterday, and it was excellent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
32. MY ASS! Another pathetic unite behind John Kerry thread I see.
Sorry, We've got a democracy to get on with.

Watch history in the making, were going all the way to the convention baby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #32
58. Wrong! I am a Bush hater first. And I would rather see Clark or Dean.
Right away, you assume that I am a stealth Kerry supporter. What does that say about you?

Did you even once consider that that I am just a patriotic American who wants Bush out in the worst way?

There is no one at DU who has posted as much as I have against Bush.

My real favorite is Al Gore. Remember him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
33. Feeling a little bit strident?
Loyalty oath threads are lame. Perhaps what you are seeing is more an adverse reaction to that than anything else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
37. I'm ABBCDEF...
Anybody But
Bush
Cheney
Delay
Ed Gillespie
Frist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
38. They have a right to vote as they prefer in GE
I wont take that right from them, though I would prefer them vote for nom, I am not gonna force them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IowaBiker Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
40. Absolutely!
This thread is making it clear that there are some very shady characters in here, who care more about their own selfish issues, rather than the good of all.

Every time the party goes their way, all America loses.

To let Bush win is awful. Where I'm from you can get bounced from the party for it.

--Brian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YNGW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
41. Banning's not good enough. Let's burn them at the stake!!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleDannySlowhorse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. I'd support capital punishment in this case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #41
56. Can I be first?
Kerry used to be my number 2. Right now he's floating between 2 & 4 for various reasons but damn, burn me first ok?

Burn someone who has defended Kerry over a few things.

It will make me feel better about all this fascism because I won't have to see it ;)

If this is the only way to get Kerry votes- then count this one out. I hope the other Kerry supporters lambast the thread's author for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FubarFly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
45. I am not ABB, I am a TBMCer
(Take Back My Country)

I will not vote for a candidate that advances the corporate agenda.

Sorry.

If your candidate is really serving in the interest of the people, then convince me. I'm all ears.

On a side note, you are REAALLLY going to hate my idea that we ban all posters who ask us to give up our democratic right to choose by posting loyalty threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #45
64. Hear, hear!!
Edited on Fri Jan-30-04 10:46 PM by krkaufman

Or maybe just a time-out, eh?

Bad democrat, baaaaaaad.



(Please note the lowercase "d"; no "Green" flames.)

edit: p.s. Supporter of Clark, democracy, free speech and secret ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoppin_Mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
46. Sorry - But I ABSOLUTELY REFUSE to vote for
LaRouche

Don't make me do it.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleDannySlowhorse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. What are you
some kind of PNAC stooge? ABB! ABB! ABB!

I said ABB! Aaaaaarrrrrrgggghhhhhhhh!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
48. Just for this- I'm going to go vote no in that silly poll.
These Gestapo technics are beneath DU. At least they used to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #48
67. Vote early, vote often...
I think I'll even delete my cookies and vote "no" a few more times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
49. no more lame ass excuses
Edited on Fri Jan-30-04 10:39 PM by corporatewhore
a weak cannidate who wont stand up against bush will lose against bush (sniffle sniffle) it will all be naders fault cause he will challenge his record that he was responsible for
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
57. I WILL SIT ON MY HANDS, I WILL SIT ON MY HANDS, I WILL SIT ON MY HANDS!!!!
What Tinoire said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:grr: :argh: :wtf::grr: :argh: :wtf::grr: :argh: :wtf::grr: :argh: :wtf::grr: :argh: :wtf::grr: :argh: :wtf::grr: :argh: :wtf::grr: :argh: :wtf::grr: :argh: :wtf::grr: :argh: :wtf::grr: :argh: :wtf::grr: :argh: :wtf::grr: :argh: :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
61. Instead of this "with us or against us" rhetoric...
why not ask "why are these voters feeling disenfranchised"? Isn't it possible that on some level they have a legitimate complaint?

I can't defend (nor do I support) 4 more years under the dark prince from Hell but I am *so* keen to tap into the progressive energy of the left! Of course, I'm assuming this sentiment is from the left...God knows why I continue to hang in there with a party that can't embrace gay marriage (when it's the moral and ethical thing to do) but wtf...4 more years under B*sh would be far worse.

Just my 2 cents. Let's build bridges to the future ya'll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
66. This is begining to sound like Bush's America to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. REALLY? So, are you saying that it would be OK
with you to have DU'ers posting here whose position was that they didn't like the Dem enough, or the Dem was not good enough for them, or whatever, so they were voting for *??

That would be okay with you?? It would really be okay with you to have Bush voters starting threads and replying to your posts??

REALLY?

WHY??

Why would you want people here who won't vote for the Democratic nominee, huh? Isn't there another message board to hang out with those people on??

WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blurp Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
71. The trouble for me is

I'm sure Kerry believes everything he says. I think in his heart he is a real Democrat.

But I can't get over how he has basically married into big money, not once, but twice - first to Julia Thorne then to Teresa Heinz. I just can't relate to him.

I liked that fact that Carter was a farmer. He had to work to get what he had. He life seems much more real to me.

When I see Kerry, I just can't see him really understanding what working life is all about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
73. Locking
4. You may not start a new discussion thread in order to continue a current or recent flame war from another thread. The moderators have the authority to lock similar threads in order to contain flaming on a particular topic to only one thread at a time.

Thanks

DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 20th 2025, 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC