As you can see from these excerpts from a long, footnoted article printed by a scholarly, left-wing journal, based on what he said and did as governor of Vermont, Dean wants less social spending. Of course, the Green Party wants to increase taxes on those who make handsome incomes, and spend that on social safety net, education, daycare, etc.
I think the quotes below show what Dean is really all about. I found some of the Dean quotes below quite disturbing, and I feel that Dean supporters need to take a good look at these quotes and decide whether this man is really a Democrat. His quotes below indicate that he is not interested in furthering the Democratic agenda.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Throughout the 1990s, Dean’s cuts in state aid to education ($6 million), retirement funds for teachers and state employees ($7 million), health care ($4 million), welfare programs earmarked for the aged, blind and disabled ($2 million), Medicaid benefits ($1.2 million) and more, amounted to roughly $30 million. Dean claimed that the cuts were necessary because the state had no money and was burdened by a $60 million deficit.9
....
Most of the Democrats in the legislature rebelled against Dean over the budget cuts, and he ended up depending on Republican votes to pass most of his proposals. At the time, a local Vermont newspaper wrote, "The biggest items on Dean’s agenda for next year are likely to provoke more opposition from the Democrats than the Republicans. Nevertheless, Dean said he feels no particular pressure to deliver the goods to his party or to promote the Democratic agenda."15
In the mid-1990s, Dean even aligned himself with the likes of Republican Newt Gingrich on his stance on cutting Medicare. He opined at the time, "The way to balance the budget is for Congress to cut Social Security, move the retirement age to 70, cut defense, Medicare and veterans pensions, while the states cut everything else."16
....
The Rutland Herald described how one protestor, Henrietta Jordan of the Vermont Center for Independent Living, "said it would be much fairer to raise taxes on people with expensive homes and cars, children in private school and a housekeeper at home than to cut programs that helped the 66,000 Vermonters living with disabilities."17 Dean responded callously, brushing off the pleas of Vermont’s most vulnerable by saying, "This seems like sort of the last gasp of the left here."18"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The rest of this article is here:
http://www.isreview.org/issues/32/dean.shtml