|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Efilroft Sul (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 05:23 PM Original message |
Feds threaten action in Westmoreland [Pennsylvania] vote machine case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
colonel odis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. what's the matter, did they find out the machines were accurate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Efilroft Sul (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 05:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Feds say the HAVA law trumps state/county referenda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurgherHoldtheLies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
2. But, but....ahhhh, I thought Republicans were for state's rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-24-06 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
4. Elfilroft Sul, I was thinking about this post over night, and realized |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Efilroft Sul (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-24-06 09:15 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Thanks, Peace Patriot, for your attention to this story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-24-06 11:55 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Here's the DU Election Reform forum on this PA lawsuit news: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donkeyotay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-24-06 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
7. HAVA supersedes? Federalized voting? Isn't that un-Constitutional? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-24-06 02:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Exactly, donkeyotay! The Constitution gives power over election systems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donkeyotay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-24-06 04:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Are you sure Paul Revere said that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-25-06 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
10. Breaking Story (Thursday) HERE: Feds plan ballot lawsuit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-25-06 09:36 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. More HERE: Attorney aims to get voting machine case to high court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-25-06 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
12. MORE: Supreme Court gets voting machine case (Governor gets involved!) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC