Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gregg Takes Lead In Attacking Bush's Homeland Security Budget

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:39 PM
Original message
Gregg Takes Lead In Attacking Bush's Homeland Security Budget
Both Republican and Democratic senators took aim Tuesday at the president's proposed 2007 Homeland Security budget in a hearing, saying it fails to live up to Bush's strong warnings about the threat of terrorist attack.

Leading the attack was Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH). It's the latest example of Congressional Republicans taking a stand against the Bush Administration. Over the past few months, Congressional Republicans have come out against a variety of issues, including federal funding of stem cell research, the way the administration handled the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, warrantless surveillance, and the proposed transfer of ports to a United Arab Emirates-owned company.

This is what happens when the President's approval rating is at an all-time low, and mid-term elections are just around the corner.

"It's a hollow budget and I can't understand it," Gregg told Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff yesterday. "I've watched the press conferences where the administration says it is committed to border security and domestic defense, and this budget isn't going to get there."

Gregg said the funding priorities of the Bush administration treat border protection like "a stepchild of national defense."

The budget does not fulfill a funding commitment to add 1,500 law-enforcement officers to guard the borders against illegal aliens. Money needed to hire the officers and supply additional beds to house illegal aliens awaiting deportation would come from the administration's proposal to double fees paid by commercial airline passengers from $2.50 per airport stop to $5. The same proposal to increase passenger fees was killed last year by Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK).

"The increase in funding is tied directly to the fee increase, and they know that is a non-starter," Gregg said. "Ted Stevens says it's a non-starter and proved it last year, yet the administration sends up budget."

Gregg had sought to have the White House include border protection funds as part of $92.2 billion in supplemental funding the Bush administration is seeking. But the Bush Administration declined his requests.

***

This item first appeared at JABBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. He Wants Something
It's not about security, it's about dividing the spoils so Gregg gets more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. you could say that about any senator

Byrd (D-WV) and Murray (D-WA) were as agitated as Gregg at the DHS budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Jughead Gregg - "A Granite State of Mind"
Wonder how many elderly widows he has tossed out of their homes lately, in keeping with so-called Republican "Family Values"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC