Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress to pass law not letting us know what is in food - really

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:13 PM
Original message
Congress to pass law not letting us know what is in food - really

http://www.democracyinaction.org/oca/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=2752

Congress Poised to Pass Bill Taking Away Your Right to Know What's in Your Food

Tell your Congressman or Congresswoman to vote "No" on House of Representatives Bill H.R. 4167, the "National Uniformity for Food Act," coming to a vote in Washington, D.C this Thursday, March 2


The House of Representatives will vote this week on a controversial "national food uniformity" labeling law that will take away local government and states' power to require food safety food labels such as those required in California and other states on foods or beverages that are likely to cause cancer, birth defects, allergic reactions, or mercury poisoning. This bill would also prevent citizens in local municipalities and states from passing laws requiring that genetically engineered foods and ingredients such as Monsanto's recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH) be labeled.

The House will vote March 2, 2006 on a bill that would gut state food safety and labeling laws. H.R. 4167, the "National Uniformity for Food Act," lowers the bar on food safety by overturning state food safety laws that are not "identical" to federal law. Hundreds of state laws and regulations are at risk, including those governing the safety of milk, fish, and shellfish. The bill is being pushed by large supermarket chains and food manufacturers, spearheaded by the powerful Grocery Manufacturers of America.

Big food corporations and the biotech industry understand that consumers are more and more concerned about food safety, genetic engineering, and chemical-intensive agriculture, and are reading labels more closely. They understand that pesticide and mercury residues and hazardous technologies such as genetic engineering and food irradiation will be rejected if there are truthful labels required on food products. Industry-sponsored H.R. 4167 is gaining momentum and must be stopped! Act now! Preserve local and regional democracy and protect yourself and your family from unsafe food by sending an email or calling your Representative and urging them to vote "No" on H.R. 4167.
-snip-
--------------------------------------


apparently congress loves the money in their pockets more then they care about us.

send these shits home and elect some new ones

if only - if only we had honest elections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. So much for the Republican mantra of "States' Rights".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yeah whatever happened to that odd little notion
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 08:15 PM by rpannier
Wasn't that part of Reagan's mantra...Returning power back to the states. Next time you talk to a Reaganite who supports scrub, ask him/her about the states rights thing. And use this as one example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did it pass?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Asking again...
DID IT PASS???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. DID IT FUCKING PASS???
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccarter84 Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. not yet according to thomas.loc.gov
freaky bill though......absurd number of co-sponsors for something I would typically think to be more trivial...and more under the radar (226 co-sponsors)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanx SO much for your response...
Please do update if you hear anything further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC