"A voting machine mess" NY Times. Danger of rushing to buy voting machines

[Amaryllis]

The New York Times
March 3, 2006
Editorial
A Voting Machine Mess

The United States Justice Department sued New York State this week for having the worst record in the nation when it comes to complying with the Help America Vote Act. Now lawyers for the state and the Bush administration are trying to negotiate a solution in a rushed atmosphere that could involve some very bad compromises. Being late is humiliating, but hurrying up and buying the wrong voting systems would be far worse.

The impatience of the Justice Department with New York is understandable, and state leaders should hang their heads. The federal government is pushing the state to complete a database, choose machines and test them by the fall elections. That would be nice, but it's simply unrealistic.

New York could lose some or all of $49 million in federal aid for the purchase of new voting machines, so officials have quite an incentive to move quickly. There have been alarming rumors about a possible agreement that would skimp on testing the new equipment, or even adopt machines that don't have the safety net of a paper trail. These are fundamental protections of the voters' right to make sure that their ballots are counted accurately. Attorney General Eliot Spitzer's lawyers must make certain that Washington does not push through insecure machines and faulty testing procedures by this backdoor route.

There are better options. The state could certify optical scanning systems, which can be adapted more easily to New York's requirements than other voting machines. (They are also less expensive than some of the fancier electronic gizmos being pushed by Albany lobbyists.) Another possible compromise would put a special machine or phone at each polling place this fall for disabled voters, who have been of particular concern to the Justice Department. Then the state would be responsible for coming up with an entire fleet of satisfactory new machines — accessible to the handicapped — in time for the presidential election in 2008.

For the rest:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/03/opinion/03fri3.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

[Changenow]

1. They've retained machines that can't be tampered

Damn them.

When are the Democrats going to start screwing with the software on these new machines to level the playing field?

[SharonAnn]

3. Lever machines can be tampered with. And there's no audit ability.

[Changenow]

4. Sounds familiar

It's certainly worthwhile to replace them with machines with similar flaws.

[aquart]

2. LEAVE MY LEVERS ALONE!

That is all.

[loudsue]

5. Eliot Spitzer needs to take Diebold & ES&S & Triad to the mat

and put their asses out of business.

He's such an incredibly wonderful Atty. General. If ANYBODY could bring down Diebold, it's him. If only he would....

:kick::kick::kick: