|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:27 PM Original message |
Democrats can't run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. I may have missed something, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
molly
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
44. Just consider the motivation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 12:26 PM Response to Reply #44 |
100. The whole new Dean attack mode has really pissed me off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastknowngood
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. take your lumps you were sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. This is at the Party, that's why I'm mad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. And stuff like this is why the Democrats will NEVER be able |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:37 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. What SHIT?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:45 PM Response to Reply #8 |
27. And why do you think so many of us are pissed at the Party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:59 PM Response to Reply #27 |
37. Oh for pete's sake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:10 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. I'm not naive enough to believe that no politician is lily white on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:18 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Work with Paul Wellstone on campaign finance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:30 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. flat out false |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:37 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. Sure sure sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:48 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. I will back up what I just said and then I demand an apology for your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 09:11 PM Response to Reply #59 |
65. Your take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 09:22 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. Unlike you I have facts from legitimate news sources |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 10:10 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. so far.....nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 02:26 AM Response to Reply #71 |
83. Actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 04:20 AM Response to Reply #83 |
86. ity suddenly dawned on you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 04:37 AM Response to Reply #86 |
89. No, not really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drfemoe
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 10:10 AM Response to Reply #89 |
90. Is that why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:56 PM Response to Reply #55 |
62. I can certainly empathize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 10:33 PM Response to Reply #55 |
78. I guess you won't be very happy then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 01:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
107. Dean is a fundamental problem for many of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 01:15 PM Response to Reply #107 |
109. Dean is running against his own party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 10:50 AM Response to Reply #8 |
94. This Logic is Truly Amazing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. I have a feeling Dean is going to be the Jerry Brown of this election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. I disagree.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. yeah, but why do their work for them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. If you can't take the heat.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:44 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. This is about the Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:46 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. So Dean runs Newsweek, now does he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:47 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. See #2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 09:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
69. This is about the party establishment, not the rank-and-file |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 01:20 PM Response to Reply #69 |
110. How did you get screwed by a returned donation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 10:14 PM Response to Reply #14 |
73. "yeah, but why do their work for them" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 04:24 AM Response to Reply #73 |
87. no kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 10:47 AM Response to Reply #87 |
93. I am in full and total agreement with you, Forkboy. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 12:35 PM Response to Reply #87 |
101. Fucking hypocrites? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
22. patently false |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:47 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. no, the Brown campaign dug it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:51 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Brown certainly never used it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andromeda
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 03:01 AM Response to Reply #4 |
85. I'm old enough to remember... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jerseycoa
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 12:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
99. Not correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
5. Out of curiousity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
6. Kerry MET with Chung *personally*. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. It's already been totally investigated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. You think Rove is going to ignore it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:40 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Of course he would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:47 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. No, it's about Kerry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:49 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. This is from 1996 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:53 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. The first time this story broke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:00 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. And where is he now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:03 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. The Lt Gov is a Republican too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:08 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. No they wouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bearfartinthewoods
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:37 PM Response to Reply #19 |
54. rove dooesn't have to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bearfartinthewoods
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
35. are there pics? please tell me there was no photo-op pics? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
displacedtexan
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
7. Let's all thank Dean! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
9. This story needed to die? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:37 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. It's BEEN INVESTIGATED!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:39 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Your opinion of Republicans is far too high. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 01:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
108. The investigation closed because RNC head Haley Barbour |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
15. Johnny Chung ~a name no democrat wants to hear again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
20. Let's just nominate someone else! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:42 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 12:42 PM Response to Reply #23 |
102. But some would use media hacks to tear down another candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:43 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. A military lobbyist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:49 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. There's always DEAN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 10:18 PM Response to Reply #25 |
75. Oh, Lookie here, a Kerry Supporter calling Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
24. Oh wait!! Worse yet! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
40. When Dean was getting bashed people claimed that it was necessary... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:09 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. He's bashing the Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:14 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Maybe he is trying to deliver our party from the tarnished image... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:19 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Howard Dean is the tarnish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:44 PM Response to Reply #47 |
57. You shouldn't be mad at Dean just because Kerry has a little scandal going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 09:12 PM Response to Reply #57 |
66. It's the Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 09:16 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. The party has other options. Kerry is not the definition of the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
48. Kerry gave the money back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:28 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. why did he take it in the first place to begin with? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:35 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. That's the better question, slinkertwink. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:36 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. that's the question I'd like to see answered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:38 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. It was a fundraiser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:45 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. it's called following the FEC rules...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:53 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. But rules are for the peons to obey, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:56 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. lol..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 09:13 PM Response to Reply #58 |
67. If I go break the rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 09:17 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. *snickers* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 04:25 AM Response to Reply #67 |
88. well,that's a good defense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 11:24 AM Response to Reply #56 |
96. You realize that there are laws against receiving stolen property, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 10:19 PM Response to Reply #48 |
76. after he got caught... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
51. with the logic used, every negative story about Dean in the 90s should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
63. kick for an illuminating thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 10:17 AM Response to Reply #63 |
91. illuminating in more ways than you know. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaraokeKarlton
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
64. Democrats just can't run Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuelahWitch
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 10:16 PM Response to Reply #64 |
74. Or politcal boredom n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
77. We should just quit now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 10:42 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. Fuck the party! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge
![]() |
Sun Feb-01-04 10:43 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. I agree, and Kerry won't do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 12:46 PM Response to Reply #80 |
103. I'm worried that every time Howard Dean thinks he's losing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 02:09 AM Response to Original message |
81. Howard Dean didn't start this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 12:51 PM Response to Reply #81 |
104. Didn't start this? Doesn't like it? Doesn't believe in it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DannyRed
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 02:23 AM Response to Original message |
82. Awwwwww |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 10:23 AM Response to Reply #82 |
92. the Today show ran a piece on the Johnny Chung scandal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 12:10 PM Response to Reply #92 |
98. Why, how "Reaganesque" of him! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 12:53 PM Response to Reply #98 |
105. He doesn't recall anyone who has so thouroughly trashed the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adjoran
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 02:47 AM Response to Original message |
84. Not fair to blame Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
95. If Dean keeps this up, we'll soon be reading about some of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
97. kick for the most illuminating thread ever..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Mon Feb-02-04 12:59 PM Response to Reply #97 |
106. It is the ... the cussedness ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC