Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Aaron Brown: Axed for criticizing celebrity coverage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:41 AM
Original message
Aaron Brown: Axed for criticizing celebrity coverage
The former CNN anchor spoke in Oregon and described cable news anchors as "highly paid piece(s) of meat."

http://www.mailtribune.com/archive/2006/0302/local/stories/07local.htm

Former CNN anchor Aaron Brown had an epiphany following his network’s saturation coverage of the 2001 murder of actor Robert Blake’s wife.

The crowd that packed SOU’s Rogue River Room Wednesday night listened as Brown recalled shuffling home at 3 a.m. after a four- hour tour of duty reporting in excruciating detail a low-level celebrity shooting on the day four Canadian soldiers died in Afghanistan. His wife was waiting up for him with only one question: Why?

"I am sure there were other things we could’ve reported that night," Brown said.

< snip >

He suggested his eventual demise at CNN resulted from criticizing the network’s obsession with lurid celebrity gossip while short-changing meaningful news.

He compared such "breaking news" to heroin — it’s good for a while, but will eventually make you feel used and dirty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. its the cables that shoud feel "feel used and dirty."

.....He compared such "breaking news" to heroin — it’s good for a while, but will eventually make you feel used and dirty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Whatever brings in the money, I guess. "Fuck the truth," they say.
Edited on Mon Mar-06-06 10:56 AM by Selatius
Corporate news, in the end, is all about making money. Providing news is an incidental as a result. Our whole way of life is built upon this concept of providing a service in order to make money, but the key difference between providing a service in order to make money off of such a service and providing a service because something merits service is the difference between personal gain and public good.

I'm not denigrating anybody here who is a capitalist or works on Wall Street or owns a business or owns shares in a Fortune 500 multinational corporate giant, but I aim to speak the truth, and the fact of the matter is that everyday you go to work, you're trying to put food on the table, but there's a difference between worrying about food and worrying about your next paycheck for the million beyond the million you already earned for the year. That's not putting food on the table. That's excess instead, and you'd be wise to face the reality of what you're doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Whatever Keeps the Republicans In Power...
It isn't about ratings, it is about being a mouthpiece for the Republicans.

They say people don't want to hear about all the Republican misdeeds,
but when Clinton was in office, it was all Monica all the time,
even when their ratings suffered for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconocrastic Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Brown's error is to think that TV networks are primary sources of news
People who really follow the news know where to get it.

TV news is largely feel-good or feel-bad pablum for the masses (with some exceptions).

When we decry the MSM, are we not really saying we're upset that the public are more interested in "entertainment" than real news? (And of course, taking the wrong side of the "news" they show?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's why I cringe every time celebrity shit hits the air.
Most notably, when Keith Olbermann introduces a piece with "stories my producers are forcing me to do." :grr:

Where do we tell someone we don't give a rat's ass about Tom-Kat??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
existentialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. take heart,
I do think that that it part of why more people are voting with their choice of electronic media and watching less television.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. I couldn't believe it when they replaced him with Cooper.
replaced one of the few shows worth watching with fluff. Cooper does a good job occasionally, like the Katrina coverage, but Brown was consistantly good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's the "circus" in "bread and circuses..."
Entertainment has long been a narcotic for the masses, so keep us sedated with celebrity stories, and we won't notice the corruption of public figures and institutions. And you know what? IT'S WORKING!!!

Karl Marx is credited with describing "religion" as "the opium of the people." Today, that honor may very well go to "entertainment."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe they'll bring him back to report on this whole Brokeback MOuntain
Edited on Mon Mar-06-06 11:28 AM by izzybeans
Oscar snub nonscandle. :sarcasm:

Celebrity obsessions are funny to me and those shows are like realtime satires. They just take themselves seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. I remember Brown joking on air about NOT covering Laci Peterson
Not in a disrespectful way, but in a pointed way none the less. I watched Brown often and it was often obvious the pressure he was under at CCN to make his news show "fluffier", and I could see him get pushed into making compromises during the last year he was on. Obviously not enough to save his show though. I miss Brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. I remember that week VIVIDLY.
Four poor Canadian bastards killed by USAsian military incompetence and miscommunication (AGAIN, no less - shades of Kosovo!), and all CNN/Faux/MSGOP can show is Robert Blake. ALL FUCKING WEEK.

Up until this February, 2006, USAsian soldiers had killed more Canadians in Afghanistan than Afghanis. You will never see this on the news or in print, however.

Bad for business, I suppose. Anyhoo, here's a blast from the past just to remind you folks who the "good guys" are:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. When AOL bought control of CNN it turned into a toothless news network
in their greater effort to keep important issues AWAY from the greater public.

That made it alot easier for the facists to get their agenda through while Bush's actions and incompetence remained unscrutinized and unpublicized until a category 5 hurricane proved to be unmanageable and unspinnable for even the most articulate mediawhore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. CNN was turning to crap long before the AOL Time Warner merger.
Edited on Mon Mar-06-06 03:47 PM by Selatius
Time Warner, if you'll note, isn't anymore people friendly than any other multimedia corporate empire. Time Warner listens to its board of directors who are the major shareholders of the corporation. They don't listen to the people because the corporation is privately owned for private gain, not publicly owned for public good. This is the price we pay for tolerating private ownership over the flow of society's information: A misinformed or poorly informed public that makes decisions that are, in many cases, harmful to the public.

When people know more about celebrities, OJ Simpson, Michael Jackson, Lacy Peterson, and Terri Schiavo than they do about the failing education system, failing health care system, degrading environment, poverty, racism/hate, the national debt, or issues surrounding war and peace, you're living in a country that's sleepwalking itself into the graveyard of history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #15
24. We need to bring back the "Fairness Doctrine"
and media ownership regulations. That right there would do a lot to solve the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Then why did he work complicitly to cover it for four years?
I remember right after 9/11, I thought that Brown would be a "serious voice" in the post-9/11 period (which, at the time, the only positive thing that I could think about the tragedy, was that hpoefully the MSM would be seriosu in its news coverage, boy was I wrong!) Unfortunately he covered many of those stories, from Michael Shakel, to Elizabeth Smart, to Michael Jackson (although Keith Olbermann devotes celeb time too, he relegates it to secondary status, I've seen Brown several times bring up the crap first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Because he tried to save his job, MSNBC gives KO more slack
You are comparing apples to oranges. It was CNN Brown worked for. Compare Brown's old show to Larry King, or Paula Zahn, or even Anderson Cooper. Better yet compare it to Nancy Grace which CCN debuted not that long before they axed Aaron Brown on their Headlines News Channel. Her rerun each day ran head to head with News Night at 10:00. Brown tried to mix in some of the stuff CNN was demanding while continuing to cover real news. It wasn't good enough for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. They never say this shit when they are receiving a paycheck nor when
it will be heard most and cause effect on the air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. I liked him. By the way, that is my town newspaper reporting. GO ROGUE
VALLEY!

RV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. CNN and PsyOps manipulate the media when, if truth be told, blowback
Edited on Mon Mar-06-06 05:16 PM by EVDebs
would have been avoided in the first place

CNN and PsyOps
http://www.counterpunch.org/cnnpsyops.html

I'm looking forward to seeing V For Vendetta. At least vicariously the people can overcome the M/I complex. Once the RFIDs and background checks (for keeping admin critics out of work permanently)

Total Surveillance
http://www.motherjones.com/interview/2005/12/albrecht.html ...

Couple this insidious technology with purposely erroneous background checks

Who is checking the background checkers?
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1128/p13s02-wmgn.html

They've offshored, outsourced, and privatized TIA. Now all they have to do is fire you for being 'of the wrong political party' and put false information in your background data...and voila ! You've just created the most insidious terror project in the US ever.

THESE stories deserve the spotlight, yet the missing blond du jour is standard media fare. And all the cable networks are doing it, not just CNN. Mr. Brown should feel lucky he's "out" of that ratrace. Alternative media, telling the truth, will (like water) eventually erode the facades the MSM puts up to prevent getting to the truth in the first place. We're too numerous, too inquisitive, and too persistent to NOT win out. They can put whatever barriers in the way, but the TRUTH will always out. Galatians 6 : 7 God is not mocked, a man reaps what he sows. So too the karma of our government !


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
19. Brown is a fine journalist and CNN should be ashamed of itself for
letting him walk out the door, no matter whether he was fired or whether he grew tired of the BS.

The man can write sentences that framed context beautifully.

I hope he returns to news journalism somewhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. CNN was not interested in a "fine" journalist.....nor are they interested
in Journalism.

Shame is not a word to be uttered on CNN unless they are speaking of those other than themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Hi, FrenchieCat. Yes -- I do wonder sometimes why CNN settles for
so much less when it could stand for so much more. I love Christiane Amanpour. I consider her the best of the CNN team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. He will! But shame on Brown, he knew he was heading for a shit
hole before he got there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
21. it's disgusting what CNN has become
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
23. What is he doing now?
I hope he found a better job. CNN really went downhill after he left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC